Prop Firms Challenges Comparisons Discount Codes Blog Contact
Home › Comparisons › Funded Futures Network vs iFunds — Which is Better?
Funded Futures Network
8.6/10
★★★★☆
VS
iFunds
7.8/10
★★★½☆

Funded Futures Network vs iFunds — Which is Better? (2026)

Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.

View Firm — Funded Futures Network View Firm — iFunds

Funded Futures Network vs iFunds — Side-by-Side

Feature Funded Futures Network iFunds
Payout
Profit Split 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen)
First Payout - On demand
Payout Frequency Same-day available On demand
Max Account Size $250,000 $500,000
Our Verdict — Funded Futures Network vs iFunds

Winner: Funded Futures Network

Funded Futures Network vs iFunds — Executive Summary (2026)

In this independent head-to-head comparison of Funded Futures Network vs iFunds, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.

Funded Futures Network: No Daily Loss Limit. Futures Only. Sim-to-Live Path. Up to $1.3M Allocation.

iFunds: No Evaluation. Choose Your Own Max DD. 50-80% Split. 24h Payout Guarantee.

Based on our independent scoring methodology, Funded Futures Network scores 8.6/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.

Quick Stats: Funded Futures Network vs iFunds

BestProp Score: Funded Futures Network scores 8.6/10 vs iFunds at 7.8/10.

Minimum Fee: Funded Futures Network starts from $125; iFunds starts from $250. Funded Futures Network is cheaper at entry level.

Profit Split: Funded Futures Network offers 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro; iFunds offers 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen). Funded Futures Network has the higher split.

Platforms: Funded Futures Network supports Quantower (FundX), EdgeProX, NinjaTrader, Browser-based; iFunds is on MT4, MT5.

Tradeable Markets: Funded Futures Network covers ES, NQ, YM, RTY, CL, GC, Treasuries, FX Futures, all Micros; iFunds offers Forex, Metals, Energies, Crypto, Stocks.

Pricing Comparison: Funded Futures Network vs iFunds

Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how Funded Futures Network and iFunds compare on pricing.

Funded Futures Network challenge fees start from $125. The firm has operated since 2022.

iFunds challenge fees start from $250. The firm has operated since 2024.

On entry-level pricing, Funded Futures Network offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.

Challenge Rules: Funded Futures Network vs iFunds

Drawdown Rules

Trading Conditions

Payout Comparison: Funded Futures Network vs iFunds

Funded Futures Network profit split: 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro. iFunds profit split: 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen). Funded Futures Network delivers the higher cut to traders.

Payout frequency: Funded Futures Network pays Same-day available; iFunds pays On demand. Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.

Funded Futures Network — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of Funded Futures Network:

Introduction to Funded Futures Network

Funded Futures Network LLC (FFN) was founded in 2022 by Kevin Swart and is headquartered in Florida, USA. The firm focuses exclusively on US futures markets and has built a reputation for transparent, trader-first evaluation rules, earning a 4.2/5 Trustpilot score from 461+ reviews. Maximum combined allocation reaches $1,300,000 per trader across multiple accounts.

Two evaluation tracks are available – Standard and Express – each with a two-stage funding path: Sim Funded Pro (80% split, consistency rules apply) advancing to Live Funded Pro (90% split, no consistency rule).

Evaluation Structure

Standard Evaluation (no daily loss limit): The defining feature of Standard accounts is the absence of a daily loss limit. Only the EOD trailing maximum drawdown applies. Intraday drawdowns that recover by end of session do not count against the account – only the closing balance is evaluated. This eliminates the most common cause of futures prop evaluation failure: a volatile session that recovers but still exceeds an intraday daily limit.

Express Evaluation (stricter consistency): Same structure as Standard but with a tighter consistency rule: the best single day may not exceed 25% of total profit target (vs 40% on Standard). For traders with a more uniform day-to-day P&L, Express offers slightly lower fees relative to account size.

Both tracks use end-of-day trailing drawdown during evaluation and transition to a more protective structure at the funded stage.

Pricing and Targets

  • $25,000: Standard $125 / Express $155. Target: $2,000. Max DD: $1,500.
  • $50,000: Standard $150 / Express $175. Target: $3,000. Max DD: $2,000.
  • $100,000: Standard $305 / Express $330. Target: $6,000. Max DD: $3,600.
  • $150,000: Standard $350 / Express $380. Target: $9,000. Max DD: $5,000.
  • $250,000: Standard $580 / Express $690. Target: $15,000. Max DD: $6,000.

A 50% discount code (TOPPROP per TPO) brings Standard fees to roughly $63-$290. Note: an activation fee of $120 applies when transitioning from evaluation to the Sim Funded Pro stage – this is in addition to the evaluation fee.

Funding Path: Sim to Live

Sim Funded Pro (80% split): The first funded stage. A 40% consistency rule applies – no single trading day may account for more than 40% of total profits. Approximately 3 payout events required to complete this stage. Same-day payouts available.

Live Funded Pro (90% split): After meeting Sim Funded Pro milestones, traders advance to Live Funded Pro with 90% split and no consistency restriction. This two-stage path rewards traders who demonstrate consistent profitability over time rather than a single outsized session.

Trading Rules

  • News trading: Allowed during evaluation. At funded stages, positions must be flat ±1 minute around Tier-1 events (FOMC, CPI, NFP).
  • Overnight/weekend holds: Not permitted. Positions must flatten by the daily session cutoff.
  • Hedging: Not allowed across correlated products or across multiple accounts.
  • Copy trading: Allowed up to a cap. Excess accounts may affect funding eligibility.
  • EAs/HFT: Confirm directly with support before use.

Platforms and Instruments

Platforms: Quantower (FundX), EdgeProX, browser-based (TradingView-style), NinjaTrader. Instruments: ES, NQ, YM, RTY (equity index futures), CL (crude oil), GC (gold), Treasury futures, FX futures, and all micro equivalents (MES, MNQ, MYM, M2K, MCL, MGC).

Payouts

  • Minimum: ~$500 per withdrawal
  • Processing: Same-day available
  • Methods: ACH, Bank Wire, PayPal (region-dependent)
  • Max total allocation: $1,300,000 per trader

Our Verdict

Funded Futures Network earns a 7.5 BestProp score. Founded in 2022, 461+ Trustpilot reviews at 4.2/5, and a $1.3M maximum allocation give FFN a credible foundation among futures prop firms. The Standard track’s absence of a daily loss limit is a meaningful structural advantage – it removes the most common source of false-positive failures in volatile futures markets. The two-stage Sim-to-Live funding path is transparent and well-designed, and the broad instrument coverage (equity indices, energy, metals, treasuries, FX futures, micros) suits diverse futures trading styles.

Key considerations: the $120 activation fee adds to the total cost beyond the evaluation fee, weekend and overnight holds are prohibited, and the payout minimum of $500 may frustrate traders on smaller accounts early in the Sim Funded Pro stage. No daily loss limit requires strong self-discipline since a single large intraday session can consume the full max drawdown buffer. Best suited for disciplined EOD-focused futures traders who trade US session hours.

iFunds — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of iFunds:

Introduction to iFunds

iFunds is operated by iFunds Ltd (Saint Lucia, Registration No. 2024-00154) and Synerjic Ltd (Cyprus, Registration No. 474148), led by CEO Layth Sanjaq. The firm offers a purely instant-funded model — there is no evaluation phase. Traders receive capital immediately and configure their own risk parameters at purchase. iFunds holds a 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating with 93% five-star reviews. Maximum account size is $500,000. Payouts are processed within 24 hours, with a 10% bonus (up to $1,000) if the 24-hour window is missed.

The defining feature of iFunds is its customizable risk-reward model: traders select their maximum drawdown threshold at account purchase (between 6% and 10% of initial balance). A lower chosen drawdown ceiling yields a higher profit split; a higher drawdown tolerance yields a lower split. This places risk management directly in the trader’s hands from day one.

How the Model Works

No evaluation. No profit target to begin trading. Traders select a max drawdown level — the lower the max DD they accept, the higher their profit share. The exact split-to-DD mapping is:

  • The lowest max DD setting (6%) yields the highest profit split (up to 80%)
  • The highest max DD setting (10%) yields the lowest split (50%)
  • Intermediate selections fall proportionally between these anchors

There is no daily loss limit on any iFunds account — only the chosen maximum drawdown applies. This gives traders full intraday flexibility; only the total equity drop from the starting balance is monitored.

Account Plans and Fees

  • Intern — $2,500: $250 participation fee
  • Starter — $5,000: $400 participation fee
  • Ambitious — $10,000: $700 participation fee
  • Higher tiers up to $500,000: Fees scale proportionally — confirm exact amounts at ifunds.io checkout

Note: fees represent a meaningful percentage of account size on smaller accounts ($250 for $2,500 = 10%). This is consistent with instant-funded models where no evaluation filters risk, and reflects the immediacy of funded access. Fees are described as a participation fee — refund terms are governed by iFunds’ separate Refund Policy.

Trading Rules

  • EAs/Automation: Allowed. Latency arbitrage and HFT prohibited.
  • News trading: Allowed.
  • Overnight holds: Allowed (with sufficient margin).
  • Trade copiers: Allowed.
  • Multiple IPs: Allowed.
  • Daily loss limit: None — only max drawdown applies.
  • Drawdown type: Static, calculated from initial balance.

Platforms and Instruments

Platforms: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Instruments: Stocks, currencies, metals, energies, cryptocurrencies. Leverage: up to 1:100 (dynamic, based on risk level). All instruments accessible on both platforms with the same account.

Payouts

  • Minimum withdrawal: $50
  • Frequency: On demand (any time with $50+ profit)
  • Processing: Within 24 hours — 10% bonus (up to $1,000) if missed
  • Methods: Crypto, Bank Wire Transfer

Our Verdict

iFunds earns a 6.5 BestProp score. The customizable risk-reward model is genuinely innovative — letting traders choose their own drawdown tolerance and receive a commensurate profit share puts risk management in the right hands. 4.7/5 Trustpilot with 93% five-star reviews is excellent for a 2024-registered firm. No daily loss limit provides real intraday freedom. EAs, news trading, trade copiers, and multi-IP are all permitted with minimal restrictions. On-demand payouts with a 24-hour guarantee and bonus incentive are strong operational commitments.

The main caution is the fee-to-account-size ratio on small accounts: $250 for a $2,500 funded account is a 10% upfront cost, and the base profit split at the highest drawdown tolerance is only 50%. Traders who want immediate funding of small accounts should run the numbers carefully — at 50% split and $250 fee, the break-even is $500 in gross profit (1 * fee * 2), meaning the account must gain 20% before the trader recups the fee net of split. iFunds works best for confident, disciplined traders who can accept tight drawdown limits in exchange for a higher profit share, or those with access to automated strategies that benefit from no daily DD restriction. The 2024 registration means the track record, while so far positive, is less than two years old.

Funded Futures Network — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 8.6/10
  • Competitive 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro profit split
  • Challenge fees from $125
  • Available on Quantower (FundX), EdgeProX, NinjaTrader, Browser-based
  • Operating since 2022

iFunds — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 7.8/10
  • Competitive 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen) profit split
  • Challenge fees from $250
  • Available on MT4, MT5
  • Operating since 2024

Final Verdict: Funded Futures Network vs iFunds (2026)

Overall, our independent scoring gives Funded Futures Network the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If iFunds better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.

Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.

Frequently Asked Questions: Funded Futures Network vs iFunds

Which is better, Funded Futures Network or iFunds?

Based on our independent scoring, Funded Futures Network scores higher overall (8.6/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.

Is Funded Futures Network cheaper than iFunds?

Funded Futures Network offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.

Which has a better profit split, Funded Futures Network or iFunds?

Funded Futures Network offers the higher profit split. Funded Futures Network: 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro. iFunds: 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen).

Can I use an EA or trading bot?

EA policies: Funded Futures Network — check the review. iFunds — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.

Which is better for news trading?

News trading: Funded Futures Network — check the review. iFunds — check the review.

Read the full Funded Futures Network review →  ·  Read the full iFunds review →

Who should choose Funded Futures Network?
  • Traders wanting 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro profit split
  • Users of Quantower (FundX), EdgeProX, NinjaTrader, Browser-based
  • Anyone looking for a top-rated funded challenge
Who should choose iFunds?
  • Traders wanting 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen) profit split
  • Users of MT4, MT5
  • Anyone looking for a solid funded challenge

Frequently Asked Questions — Funded Futures Network vs iFunds

Based on our scoring methodology, Funded Futures Network edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.

Funded Futures Network offers 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro profit split, while iFunds offers 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen) profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.

Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.

Funded Futures Network processes first payouts in - day(s), while iFunds takes approximately On demand day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.

Neither Funded Futures Network nor iFunds are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.

Funded Futures Network
8.6/10
Read Review →
iFunds
7.8/10
Read Review →