Prop Firms Challenges Comparisons Discount Codes Blog Contact
Home › Comparisons › FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network — Which is Better?
FundingPips
9.6/10
★★★★½
VS
Funded Futures Network
8.6/10
★★★★☆

FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network — Which is Better? (2026)

Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.

Get Funded Now — FundingPips View Firm — Funded Futures Network

FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network — Side-by-Side

Feature FundingPips Funded Futures Network
Payout
Profit Split 80% → 90% 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro
First Payout 5 -
Payout Frequency Every 5 days (Tuesdays) Same-day available
Max Account Size $100,000 $250,000
Our Verdict — FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network

Winner: FundingPips

FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network — Executive Summary (2026)

In this independent head-to-head comparison of FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.

FundingPips: The Fastest Payout Cycle in Prop Trading

Funded Futures Network: No Daily Loss Limit. Futures Only. Sim-to-Live Path. Up to $1.3M Allocation.

Based on our independent scoring methodology, FundingPips scores 9.6/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.

Quick Stats: FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network

BestProp Score: FundingPips scores 9.6/10 vs Funded Futures Network at 8.6/10.

Minimum Fee: FundingPips starts from $36; Funded Futures Network starts from $125. FundingPips is cheaper at entry level.

Profit Split: FundingPips offers 80% → 90%; Funded Futures Network offers 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro. Funded Futures Network has the higher split.

Platforms: FundingPips supports cTrader, Match Trader, MT5; Funded Futures Network is on Quantower (FundX), EdgeProX, NinjaTrader, Browser-based.

Tradeable Markets: FundingPips covers Forex, Metals, Energy, Indices, Crypto; Funded Futures Network offers ES, NQ, YM, RTY, CL, GC, Treasuries, FX Futures, all Micros.

Pricing Comparison: FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network

Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how FundingPips and Funded Futures Network compare on pricing.

FundingPips challenge fees start from $36. The firm has operated since 2022. Total payouts to date: $260M+.

Funded Futures Network challenge fees start from $125. The firm has operated since 2022.

On entry-level pricing, FundingPips offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.

Challenge Rules: FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network

Drawdown Rules

Trading Conditions

Payout Comparison: FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network

FundingPips profit split: 80% → 90%. Funded Futures Network profit split: 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro. Funded Futures Network delivers the higher cut to traders.

Payout frequency: FundingPips pays Every 5 days (Tuesdays); Funded Futures Network pays Same-day available. Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.

FundingPips — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of FundingPips:

Introduction to FundingPips

FundingPips launched in 2022 from Dubai and has since become one of the fastest-growing prop firms in the industry by a significant margin. The numbers are hard to argue with: $260M+ in total rewards paid to traders, 4.7/5 on Trustpilot from over 10,000 reviews, and a 5-day payout cycle that gives traders up to four withdrawals per month. For a firm founded three years ago, this is an exceptional track record.

CEO Khaled Ayesh is publicly visible and actively engaged with the trading community — a transparency marker that matters when evaluating younger firms. FundingPips also runs consistently among the lowest-fee prop firms in the space, with a $5,000 account available for $36.

Who Is FundingPips For?

FundingPips suits forex, commodities, and crypto traders who want a high-frequency payout cycle, permissive trading rules, and low entry costs. The 5-day payout schedule is the standout feature — if cash flow matters to your trading operation, getting paid every Tuesday rather than every two to four weeks is a meaningful difference.

EAs and expert advisors are permitted, news trading is allowed, and crypto trades 24/7 on weekends. The trailing drawdown is the main technical challenge — it follows your highest balance, not just the starting amount, which demands tighter ongoing risk management than static drawdown firms.

Challenge Program

FundingPips uses a two-phase evaluation structure called Student → Practitioner → Master:

  • Phase 1 (Student): 8% profit target, 5% daily drawdown, 10% trailing maximum drawdown. No time limit.
  • Phase 2 (Practitioner): 5% profit target, same drawdown rules. No time limit.
  • Master (Funded): Trade with full capital. 5-day payout cycle, 80% split rising to 90% after 4 payouts.

All fees are refunded after your 4th successful payout — effectively making the challenge free for traders who maintain funded status through four withdrawal cycles. FundingPips also offers 1-Step, Pro, and Zero program variants with different fee and rule structures — check their site for current availability and pricing on those formats.

Fees by Account Size

Account Size Fee
$5,000 $36
$10,000 $66
$25,000 $158
$50,000 $278
$100,000 $529

Trading Rules

  • Daily drawdown: 5% — based on balance or equity, whichever is lower at any point during the day
  • Maximum drawdown: 10% trailing — follows your highest reached balance, not just the starting amount. This is the most important rule to manage carefully.
  • No time limits on either phase
  • EAs/automated systems: Permitted
  • News trading: Permitted
  • Crypto: Available 24/7 including weekends

Payouts and Scaling

  • Payout frequency: Every 5 days (every Tuesday) — up to 4 payouts per month
  • Methods: Crypto (USDT via TRC20) and Rise
  • Starting split: 80%
  • After 4th payout: 90% split + 20% account size increase
  • Maximum allocation: $2,000,000 via scaling plan
  • Fee refund: Challenge fee returned after 4th successful payout

Our Verdict

FundingPips earns an 8.8 BestProp score — the second-highest we award. The combination of $260M+ in proven payouts, 4.7/5 Trustpilot from 10,000+ verified reviews, industry-lowest fees, and a 5-day payout cycle makes it one of the most compelling prop firms available in 2026.

The trailing drawdown is the only significant challenge — it requires ongoing discipline to avoid giving back gains and seeing your drawdown limit tighten with every new high. Traders who understand trailing drawdown mechanics and manage it actively will find FundingPips one of the best-value funded trading programs on the market.

Funded Futures Network — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of Funded Futures Network:

Introduction to Funded Futures Network

Funded Futures Network LLC (FFN) was founded in 2022 by Kevin Swart and is headquartered in Florida, USA. The firm focuses exclusively on US futures markets and has built a reputation for transparent, trader-first evaluation rules, earning a 4.2/5 Trustpilot score from 461+ reviews. Maximum combined allocation reaches $1,300,000 per trader across multiple accounts.

Two evaluation tracks are available – Standard and Express – each with a two-stage funding path: Sim Funded Pro (80% split, consistency rules apply) advancing to Live Funded Pro (90% split, no consistency rule).

Evaluation Structure

Standard Evaluation (no daily loss limit): The defining feature of Standard accounts is the absence of a daily loss limit. Only the EOD trailing maximum drawdown applies. Intraday drawdowns that recover by end of session do not count against the account – only the closing balance is evaluated. This eliminates the most common cause of futures prop evaluation failure: a volatile session that recovers but still exceeds an intraday daily limit.

Express Evaluation (stricter consistency): Same structure as Standard but with a tighter consistency rule: the best single day may not exceed 25% of total profit target (vs 40% on Standard). For traders with a more uniform day-to-day P&L, Express offers slightly lower fees relative to account size.

Both tracks use end-of-day trailing drawdown during evaluation and transition to a more protective structure at the funded stage.

Pricing and Targets

  • $25,000: Standard $125 / Express $155. Target: $2,000. Max DD: $1,500.
  • $50,000: Standard $150 / Express $175. Target: $3,000. Max DD: $2,000.
  • $100,000: Standard $305 / Express $330. Target: $6,000. Max DD: $3,600.
  • $150,000: Standard $350 / Express $380. Target: $9,000. Max DD: $5,000.
  • $250,000: Standard $580 / Express $690. Target: $15,000. Max DD: $6,000.

A 50% discount code (TOPPROP per TPO) brings Standard fees to roughly $63-$290. Note: an activation fee of $120 applies when transitioning from evaluation to the Sim Funded Pro stage – this is in addition to the evaluation fee.

Funding Path: Sim to Live

Sim Funded Pro (80% split): The first funded stage. A 40% consistency rule applies – no single trading day may account for more than 40% of total profits. Approximately 3 payout events required to complete this stage. Same-day payouts available.

Live Funded Pro (90% split): After meeting Sim Funded Pro milestones, traders advance to Live Funded Pro with 90% split and no consistency restriction. This two-stage path rewards traders who demonstrate consistent profitability over time rather than a single outsized session.

Trading Rules

  • News trading: Allowed during evaluation. At funded stages, positions must be flat ±1 minute around Tier-1 events (FOMC, CPI, NFP).
  • Overnight/weekend holds: Not permitted. Positions must flatten by the daily session cutoff.
  • Hedging: Not allowed across correlated products or across multiple accounts.
  • Copy trading: Allowed up to a cap. Excess accounts may affect funding eligibility.
  • EAs/HFT: Confirm directly with support before use.

Platforms and Instruments

Platforms: Quantower (FundX), EdgeProX, browser-based (TradingView-style), NinjaTrader. Instruments: ES, NQ, YM, RTY (equity index futures), CL (crude oil), GC (gold), Treasury futures, FX futures, and all micro equivalents (MES, MNQ, MYM, M2K, MCL, MGC).

Payouts

  • Minimum: ~$500 per withdrawal
  • Processing: Same-day available
  • Methods: ACH, Bank Wire, PayPal (region-dependent)
  • Max total allocation: $1,300,000 per trader

Our Verdict

Funded Futures Network earns a 7.5 BestProp score. Founded in 2022, 461+ Trustpilot reviews at 4.2/5, and a $1.3M maximum allocation give FFN a credible foundation among futures prop firms. The Standard track’s absence of a daily loss limit is a meaningful structural advantage – it removes the most common source of false-positive failures in volatile futures markets. The two-stage Sim-to-Live funding path is transparent and well-designed, and the broad instrument coverage (equity indices, energy, metals, treasuries, FX futures, micros) suits diverse futures trading styles.

Key considerations: the $120 activation fee adds to the total cost beyond the evaluation fee, weekend and overnight holds are prohibited, and the payout minimum of $500 may frustrate traders on smaller accounts early in the Sim Funded Pro stage. No daily loss limit requires strong self-discipline since a single large intraday session can consume the full max drawdown buffer. Best suited for disciplined EOD-focused futures traders who trade US session hours.

FundingPips — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 9.6/10
  • Competitive 80% → 90% profit split
  • Challenge fees from $36
  • $260M+ total paid out
  • Available on cTrader, Match Trader, MT5
  • Operating since 2022

Funded Futures Network — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 8.6/10
  • Competitive 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro profit split
  • Challenge fees from $125
  • Available on Quantower (FundX), EdgeProX, NinjaTrader, Browser-based
  • Operating since 2022

Final Verdict: FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network (2026)

Overall, our independent scoring gives FundingPips the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If Funded Futures Network better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.

Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.

Frequently Asked Questions: FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network

Which is better, FundingPips or Funded Futures Network?

Based on our independent scoring, FundingPips scores higher overall (9.6/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.

Is FundingPips cheaper than Funded Futures Network?

FundingPips offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.

Which has a better profit split, FundingPips or Funded Futures Network?

Funded Futures Network offers the higher profit split. FundingPips: 80% → 90%. Funded Futures Network: 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro.

Can I use an EA or trading bot?

EA policies: FundingPips — check the review. Funded Futures Network — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.

Which is better for news trading?

News trading: FundingPips — check the review. Funded Futures Network — check the review.

Read the full FundingPips review →  ·  Read the full Funded Futures Network review →

Who should choose FundingPips?
  • Traders wanting 80% → 90% profit split
  • Users of cTrader, Match Trader, MT5
  • Anyone looking for a top-rated funded challenge
Who should choose Funded Futures Network?
  • Traders wanting 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro profit split
  • Users of Quantower (FundX), EdgeProX, NinjaTrader, Browser-based
  • Anyone looking for a top-rated funded challenge

Frequently Asked Questions — FundingPips vs Funded Futures Network

Based on our scoring methodology, FundingPips edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.

FundingPips offers 80% → 90% profit split, while Funded Futures Network offers 80% Sim Funded Pro → 90% Live Funded Pro profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.

Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.

FundingPips processes first payouts in 5 day(s), while Funded Futures Network takes approximately - day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.

Neither FundingPips nor Funded Futures Network are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.

FundingPips
9.6/10
Read Review →
Funded Futures Network
8.6/10
Read Review →