Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | For Traders | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 80% → 90% | 80% → 90% |
| First Payout | — | 5 |
| Payout Frequency | On-demand (48h guarantee) | Every 5 days (Tuesdays) |
| Max Account Size | $100,000 | $100,000 |
In this independent head-to-head comparison of For Traders vs FundingPips, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
For Traders: Our Challenge. Your Rules.
FundingPips: The Fastest Payout Cycle in Prop Trading
Based on our independent scoring methodology, FundingPips scores 9.6/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: For Traders scores 9.1/10 vs FundingPips at 9.6/10.
Minimum Fee: For Traders starts from $50; FundingPips starts from $36. FundingPips is cheaper at entry level.
Profit Split: For Traders offers 80% → 90%; FundingPips offers 80% → 90%. FundingPips has the higher split.
Platforms: For Traders supports TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5; FundingPips is on cTrader, Match Trader, MT5.
Tradeable Markets: For Traders covers Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto, Futures; FundingPips offers Forex, Metals, Energy, Indices, Crypto.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how For Traders and FundingPips compare on pricing.
For Traders challenge fees start from $50. The firm has operated since 2023. They have funded over 150,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $10M+.
FundingPips challenge fees start from $36. The firm has operated since 2022. Total payouts to date: $260M+.
On entry-level pricing, FundingPips offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.
For Traders profit split: 80% → 90%. FundingPips profit split: 80% → 90%. FundingPips delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: For Traders pays On-demand (48h guarantee); FundingPips pays Every 5 days (Tuesdays). Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of For Traders:
For Traders launched in 2023 with a simple positioning statement: Our Challenge. Your Rules. The Prague and Dubai-based firm lets traders configure their challenge parameters — target, variant, and capital — before buying, rather than fitting their strategy to a fixed rulebook. With 150,000+ customers, $10M+ paid out, and a 48-hour payout guarantee (backed by a 100% profit split penalty if they miss it), For Traders has built a credible track record in a short time.
The firm covers forex, indices, metals, crypto, and futures — one of the broadest instrument sets in the funded trading space outside of FTMO — and supports TradeLocker, cTrader, and MT5 across web, mobile, and desktop.
For Traders suits multi-market traders who want to fund a forex, futures, or crypto account under a single brand. If you trade different asset classes with different strategies, For Traders lets you run separate programs per market rather than forcing everything into one account type.
The firm is also a strong fit for traders who prioritise payout reliability — the 48-hour guarantee with a financial penalty for delays is one of the few hard contractual commitments in the prop firm space.
For Traders offers five distinct funding programs:
Account sizes run from $5,000 up to $100,000 per market standard, with Premium Program access up to $300,000 for top-performing traders. Fees start at $50 for a $5,000 account, scaling to $399 for a $100,000 1-Step Forex account.
For Traders supports three platforms across all devices:
Tradable assets: 100+ forex pairs, 50+ crypto coins (24/7 including weekends), major indices (US30, NAS100, DAX40), gold, silver, oil, and futures contracts. MT4 is not supported.
For Traders’ payout infrastructure is one of its strongest selling points:
The card and crypto withdrawal options being free and instant are a genuine differentiator — most prop firms charge fees on all withdrawal methods.
For Traders earns an 8.2 BestProp score. The multi-market coverage, configurable challenge format, and 48-hour payout guarantee make it one of the more complete prop firm offerings launched in the last three years. The trailing drawdown on the 1-Step Forex program is more forgiving than static drawdown, which suits swing traders and position traders well.
The caution is the news trading restriction and the 40% margin rule — both require attention if you run macro-driven or high-leverage strategies. For traders who can work within those guardrails, For Traders delivers genuine value across forex, futures, and crypto from a single platform.
Here is our full independent review of FundingPips:
FundingPips launched in 2022 from Dubai and has since become one of the fastest-growing prop firms in the industry by a significant margin. The numbers are hard to argue with: $260M+ in total rewards paid to traders, 4.7/5 on Trustpilot from over 10,000 reviews, and a 5-day payout cycle that gives traders up to four withdrawals per month. For a firm founded three years ago, this is an exceptional track record.
CEO Khaled Ayesh is publicly visible and actively engaged with the trading community — a transparency marker that matters when evaluating younger firms. FundingPips also runs consistently among the lowest-fee prop firms in the space, with a $5,000 account available for $36.
FundingPips suits forex, commodities, and crypto traders who want a high-frequency payout cycle, permissive trading rules, and low entry costs. The 5-day payout schedule is the standout feature — if cash flow matters to your trading operation, getting paid every Tuesday rather than every two to four weeks is a meaningful difference.
EAs and expert advisors are permitted, news trading is allowed, and crypto trades 24/7 on weekends. The trailing drawdown is the main technical challenge — it follows your highest balance, not just the starting amount, which demands tighter ongoing risk management than static drawdown firms.
FundingPips uses a two-phase evaluation structure called Student → Practitioner → Master:
All fees are refunded after your 4th successful payout — effectively making the challenge free for traders who maintain funded status through four withdrawal cycles. FundingPips also offers 1-Step, Pro, and Zero program variants with different fee and rule structures — check their site for current availability and pricing on those formats.
| Account Size | Fee |
|---|---|
| $5,000 | $36 |
| $10,000 | $66 |
| $25,000 | $158 |
| $50,000 | $278 |
| $100,000 | $529 |
FundingPips earns an 8.8 BestProp score — the second-highest we award. The combination of $260M+ in proven payouts, 4.7/5 Trustpilot from 10,000+ verified reviews, industry-lowest fees, and a 5-day payout cycle makes it one of the most compelling prop firms available in 2026.
The trailing drawdown is the only significant challenge — it requires ongoing discipline to avoid giving back gains and seeing your drawdown limit tighten with every new high. Traders who understand trailing drawdown mechanics and manage it actively will find FundingPips one of the best-value funded trading programs on the market.
Overall, our independent scoring gives FundingPips the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If For Traders better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, FundingPips scores higher overall (9.6/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
FundingPips offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.
FundingPips offers the higher profit split. For Traders: 80% → 90%. FundingPips: 80% → 90%.
EA policies: For Traders — check the review. FundingPips — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: For Traders — check the review. FundingPips — check the review.
Read the full For Traders review → · Read the full FundingPips review →
Based on our scoring methodology, FundingPips edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
For Traders offers 80% → 90% profit split, while FundingPips offers 80% → 90% profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Yes! For Traders has code BESTPROP10. FundingPips has code 916E318D. Use these at checkout to save on your challenge fee.
For Traders processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while FundingPips takes approximately 5 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither For Traders nor FundingPips are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
