Prop Firms Challenges Comparisons Discount Codes Blog Contact
Home › Comparisons › Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital — Which is Better?
Funded Trading Plus
8.9/10
★★★★½
VS
Audacity Capital
7.8/10
★★★½☆

Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital — Which is Better? (2026)

Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.

View Firm — Funded Trading Plus View Firm — Audacity Capital

Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital — Side-by-Side

Feature Funded Trading Plus Audacity Capital
Payout
Profit Split Up to 100% 50-95% (scales over time)
First Payout — 14
Payout Frequency Weekly (3, 5, or 7-day intervals) Bi-weekly (Ability Challenge), Weekly (FTP)
Max Account Size $400,000 $240,000
Our Verdict — Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital

Winner: Funded Trading Plus

Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital — Executive Summary (2026)

In this independent head-to-head comparison of Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.

Funded Trading Plus: 4.7/5 Trustpilot. No Min Trading Days. Weekly Payouts from Day 0. 100% Split.

Audacity Capital: One of the oldest prop firms globally, with generous drawdown limits and 12+ years of operation.

Based on our independent scoring methodology, Funded Trading Plus scores 8.9/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.

Quick Stats: Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital

BestProp Score: Funded Trading Plus scores 8.9/10 vs Audacity Capital at 7.8/10.

Minimum Fee: Funded Trading Plus starts from $119; Audacity Capital starts from $49. Audacity Capital is cheaper at entry level.

Profit Split: Funded Trading Plus offers Up to 100%; Audacity Capital offers 50-95% (scales over time). Audacity Capital has the higher split.

Platforms: Funded Trading Plus supports cTrader, Match Trader, DXTrade; Audacity Capital is on MetaTrader 5.

Tradeable Markets: Funded Trading Plus covers Forex, Metals, Energy, Indices, Crypto; Audacity Capital offers Forex, Metals, Indices.

Pricing Comparison: Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital

Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how Funded Trading Plus and Audacity Capital compare on pricing.

Funded Trading Plus challenge fees start from $119. The firm has operated since 2021.

Audacity Capital challenge fees start from $49. The firm has operated since 2012. They have funded over 500,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $250,000,000+.

On entry-level pricing, Audacity Capital offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.

Challenge Rules: Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital

Drawdown Rules

Trading Conditions

Payout Comparison: Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital

Funded Trading Plus profit split: Up to 100%. Audacity Capital profit split: 50-95% (scales over time). Audacity Capital delivers the higher cut to traders.

Payout frequency: Funded Trading Plus pays Weekly (3, 5, or 7-day intervals); Audacity Capital pays Bi-weekly (Ability Challenge), Weekly (FTP). Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.

Funded Trading Plus — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of Funded Trading Plus:

Introduction to Funded Trading Plus

Funded Trading Plus (FTP) was founded in November 2021 by co-founder Simon Massey and is operated by FTP London Ltd, registered at 7 Bell Yard, London WC2A 2JR, UK. The firm has built one of the strongest reputations in the CFD prop space: 4.7/5 Trustpilot from over 2,000 reviews, with more than 90% five-star ratings. Maximum initial account size is $400,000, scaling to $2,500,000 with the Enhanced Scaling add-on. All programs operate on cTrader, Match Trader, or DXTrade with access to Forex, Metals, Energy, Indices, and Crypto.

The defining operational strengths: no minimum trading days on four of six programs, weekly payouts from Day 0, and a 100% profit split achievable on all programs after scaling. EAs, algos, and bots are fully supported.

Programs

One-Phase Experienced ($119-$949 for $12.5K-$200K): Single phase, 10% profit target. Daily loss: 4%. Max drawdown: 6% static. No minimum trading days. Up to 100% split. Minimum $50 withdrawal. First payout from Day 0. Best for experienced traders who want a clean single-phase structure with no time pressure.

Two-Phase Premium ($247-$1,097 for $25K-$200K): Phase 1: 8%. Phase 2: 5%. Daily loss: 4%. Max drawdown: 8% static. No minimum trading days. Up to 100% split. A balanced two-phase program with lower combined targets (8%+5%) and tighter daily loss than Advanced.

Two-Phase Advanced ($249-$1,099 for $25K-$200K): Phase 1: 10%. Phase 2: 5%. Daily loss: 5%. Max drawdown: 10% static. No minimum trading days. Up to 100% split. Wider buffers than Premium — suited to traders who want more room and are comfortable with a higher combined target.

Prestige Lite ($129-$209 for $25K-$50K) and Prestige Pro ($139-$469 for $25K-$200K): Both follow a 10%/5% two-phase structure with 5% daily DD, 10% max DD, and a minimum 3 trading days requirement — the only programs in the lineup with a minimum day rule. Weekly payouts. Up to 100% split.

Master Instant Funding ($225-$4,500 for $5K-$100K): No evaluation. No profit target. Daily loss: 6%. Max drawdown: 6% static. Immediate funded access. Cannot hold positions over weekends. Up to 100% split. First payout from Day 0, weekly thereafter. The high fees relative to account size reflect the absence of any evaluation hurdle.

Payouts and Scaling

  • Frequency: Weekly (choose 3, 5, or 7-day payout intervals)
  • Processing: Same-day in most cases; 2 business day maximum
  • Minimum withdrawal: $50
  • Methods: Cryptocurrency wallets, Bank Wire Transfer
  • Scaling: Triggered by 10% simulated profit. Scales up to $400K base, or $2.5M with Enhanced Scaling add-on. No time restrictions on scaling requests.

Trading Rules

  • EAs/Algos/Bots: Fully permitted on all programs.
  • Hedging: Permitted within the same account. Prohibited across multiple accounts.
  • Arbitrage: Strictly prohibited.
  • News trading: Not explicitly restricted — confirm with support for specific programs.
  • Weekend holds: Not permitted on Master Instant Funding accounts. Permitted on evaluation programs.
  • Drawdown type: Static (total loss limit) on all programs — no trailing drawdown.

Platforms and Instruments

Platforms: cTrader, Match Trader, DXTrade. Instruments: Forex, Metals, Energy, Indices, Crypto. Three-platform choice is above average for UK-registered firms. cTrader offers institutional-grade execution with raw spreads on many pairs.

Our Verdict

Funded Trading Plus earns an 8.0 BestProp score — one of the strongest among UK-registered prop firms. The 4.7/5 Trustpilot from 2,000+ reviews (90%+ five-star) is an exceptional credibility signal for a firm founded in 2021. No minimum trading days on four programs removes artificial time pressure. Weekly payouts from Day 0, full EA support, a 100% achievable profit split, and a £400K maximum allocation make this a trader-first operation. Static drawdown across all programs means there is no trailing high-water mark to worry about intraday.

The main considerations: Master Instant Funding has very high fees relative to account size ($4,500 for $100K instant access), weekend holds are prohibited on Instant accounts, and news trading restrictions are not clearly published — verify before purchase if event trading is part of your strategy. Overall, FTP is a top-tier option for systematic traders, EA operators, and anyone who values payout speed and operational reliability over the lowest possible entry fee.

Audacity Capital — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of Audacity Capital:

Overview

Audacity Capital was founded in 2012, making it one of the longest-running prop trading firms in the world. UK-registered (Companies House 11652683) under CEO Karim Yousfi, the firm claims over $250 million paid out to traders and 500,000+ funded traders globally — numbers built over more than a decade of operation. The firm offers three programs: the 2-phase Ability Challenge, the 1-step Ability One, and the Funded Trader Program (FTP / Instant Funding).

Programs

The Ability Challenge is a two-phase evaluation. Phase 1 requires a 10% profit target with a 7.5% daily drawdown and 15% max drawdown — among the most generous drawdown limits in the industry. Phase 2 requires 5% with tighter 5%/10% limits. The Ability One is a single-phase evaluation with a 10% target, 3% daily, and 6% max drawdown. The FTP (Instant Funding) provides immediate funded access with up to 95% profit split and weekly payouts.

Trailing Drawdown Warning

The Ability Challenge uses a trailing drawdown that resets daily when equity hits new highs. This mechanism confuses some traders — the daily limit recalculates at each new equity peak, meaning a trader can technically be in breach even while net-profitable over the full period. Review the drawdown rules carefully before trading.

Trading Rules

News trading is allowed on the Ability Challenge without restrictions. The FTP requires a 30-minute waiting period after major economic events. EAs and copy trading are permitted. HFT, cross-account hedging, and martingale strategies are prohibited. Traders from the US, Syria, Iran, and North Korea cannot access the platform.

Payouts

Ability Challenge payouts are made every 14 days via bank wire, Wise, PayPal, or crypto. The profit split starts at 50-75% on the Ability Challenge and scales to 95% over time. FTP accounts pay weekly at up to 95% immediately.

Trustpilot Note

Trustpilot score is 3.4/5 from 1,067 reviews. While the majority of reviews are positive, approximately 125 are 1-star — prospective traders should review recent trader experiences before committing to the platform.

Funded Trading Plus — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 8.9/10
  • Competitive Up to 100% profit split
  • Challenge fees from $119
  • Available on cTrader, Match Trader, DXTrade
  • Operating since 2021

Audacity Capital — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 7.8/10
  • Competitive 50-95% (scales over time) profit split
  • Challenge fees from $49
  • 500,000+ funded traders
  • $250,000,000+ total paid out
  • Available on MetaTrader 5
  • Operating since 2012

Final Verdict: Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital (2026)

Overall, our independent scoring gives Funded Trading Plus the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If Audacity Capital better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.

Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.

Frequently Asked Questions: Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital

Which is better, Funded Trading Plus or Audacity Capital?

Based on our independent scoring, Funded Trading Plus scores higher overall (8.9/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.

Is Funded Trading Plus cheaper than Audacity Capital?

Audacity Capital offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.

Which has a better profit split, Funded Trading Plus or Audacity Capital?

Audacity Capital offers the higher profit split. Funded Trading Plus: Up to 100%. Audacity Capital: 50-95% (scales over time).

Can I use an EA or trading bot?

EA policies: Funded Trading Plus — check the review. Audacity Capital — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.

Which is better for news trading?

News trading: Funded Trading Plus — check the review. Audacity Capital — check the review.

Read the full Funded Trading Plus review →  ·  Read the full Audacity Capital review →

Who should choose Funded Trading Plus?
  • Traders wanting Up to 100% profit split
  • Users of cTrader, Match Trader, DXTrade
  • Anyone looking for a top-rated funded challenge
Who should choose Audacity Capital?
  • Traders wanting 50-95% (scales over time) profit split
  • Users of MetaTrader 5
  • Anyone looking for a solid funded challenge

Frequently Asked Questions — Funded Trading Plus vs Audacity Capital

Based on our scoring methodology, Funded Trading Plus edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.

Funded Trading Plus offers Up to 100% profit split, while Audacity Capital offers 50-95% (scales over time) profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.

Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.

Funded Trading Plus processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while Audacity Capital takes approximately 14 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.

Neither Funded Trading Plus nor Audacity Capital are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.

Funded Trading Plus
8.9/10
Read Review →
Audacity Capital
7.8/10
Read Review →