Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | FundingPips | WeMasterTrade |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 80% → 90% | 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded) |
| First Payout | 5 | — |
| Payout Frequency | Every 5 days (Tuesdays) | On-demand / Daily |
| Max Account Size | $100,000 | $100,000 |
Winner: FundingPips
In this independent head-to-head comparison of FundingPips vs WeMasterTrade, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
FundingPips: The Fastest Payout Cycle in Prop Trading
WeMasterTrade: 30% Profit Share During the Challenge. EAs & Copy Trading Allowed.
Based on our independent scoring methodology, FundingPips scores 9.6/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: FundingPips scores 9.6/10 vs WeMasterTrade at 8.3/10.
Minimum Fee: FundingPips starts from $36; WeMasterTrade starts from $45. FundingPips is cheaper at entry level.
Profit Split: FundingPips offers 80% → 90%; WeMasterTrade offers 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded). FundingPips has the higher split.
Platforms: FundingPips supports cTrader, Match Trader, MT5; WeMasterTrade is on MT5, MatchTrader.
Tradeable Markets: FundingPips covers Forex, Metals, Energy, Indices, Crypto; WeMasterTrade offers Forex, Crypto, Stocks, Indices, Metals, Energy, Commodities.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how FundingPips and WeMasterTrade compare on pricing.
FundingPips challenge fees start from $36. The firm has operated since 2022. Total payouts to date: $260M+.
WeMasterTrade challenge fees start from $45. The firm has operated since 2020.
On entry-level pricing, FundingPips offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.
FundingPips profit split: 80% → 90%. WeMasterTrade profit split: 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded). FundingPips delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: FundingPips pays Every 5 days (Tuesdays); WeMasterTrade pays On-demand / Daily. Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of FundingPips:
FundingPips launched in 2022 from Dubai and has since become one of the fastest-growing prop firms in the industry by a significant margin. The numbers are hard to argue with: $260M+ in total rewards paid to traders, 4.7/5 on Trustpilot from over 10,000 reviews, and a 5-day payout cycle that gives traders up to four withdrawals per month. For a firm founded three years ago, this is an exceptional track record.
CEO Khaled Ayesh is publicly visible and actively engaged with the trading community — a transparency marker that matters when evaluating younger firms. FundingPips also runs consistently among the lowest-fee prop firms in the space, with a $5,000 account available for $36.
FundingPips suits forex, commodities, and crypto traders who want a high-frequency payout cycle, permissive trading rules, and low entry costs. The 5-day payout schedule is the standout feature — if cash flow matters to your trading operation, getting paid every Tuesday rather than every two to four weeks is a meaningful difference.
EAs and expert advisors are permitted, news trading is allowed, and crypto trades 24/7 on weekends. The trailing drawdown is the main technical challenge — it follows your highest balance, not just the starting amount, which demands tighter ongoing risk management than static drawdown firms.
FundingPips uses a two-phase evaluation structure called Student → Practitioner → Master:
All fees are refunded after your 4th successful payout — effectively making the challenge free for traders who maintain funded status through four withdrawal cycles. FundingPips also offers 1-Step, Pro, and Zero program variants with different fee and rule structures — check their site for current availability and pricing on those formats.
| Account Size | Fee |
|---|---|
| $5,000 | $36 |
| $10,000 | $66 |
| $25,000 | $158 |
| $50,000 | $278 |
| $100,000 | $529 |
FundingPips earns an 8.8 BestProp score — the second-highest we award. The combination of $260M+ in proven payouts, 4.7/5 Trustpilot from 10,000+ verified reviews, industry-lowest fees, and a 5-day payout cycle makes it one of the most compelling prop firms available in 2026.
The trailing drawdown is the only significant challenge — it requires ongoing discipline to avoid giving back gains and seeing your drawdown limit tighten with every new high. Traders who understand trailing drawdown mechanics and manage it actively will find FundingPips one of the best-value funded trading programs on the market.
Here is our full independent review of WeMasterTrade:
WeMasterTrade was founded in 2020 under WeCopy Fintech Inc (registered in Vancouver, Canada) with prop trading operations running through Dubai (IFZA license 66242) and Saint Lucia entities. CEO Andrew Anth leads a platform with a Trustpilot score of 4.5/5 from 1,800+ reviews — solid independent validation for a firm of this size.
The platform has one genuinely unusual feature that sets it apart from every other firm in our database: traders earn a 30% profit share during the challenge phase itself — before passing, before getting funded. Most firms pay nothing during evaluation. WeMasterTrade pays 30% on challenge profits from day one. This meaningfully changes the risk calculus of taking a challenge: the fee has a realistic chance of being partially or fully recovered through challenge-phase earnings even if the trader doesn’t ultimately pass.
A second distinctive feature: the firm’s algorithm copies trader positions to live firm accounts in parallel — meaning the activity on funded accounts has real market consequences, not just simulated bookkeeping.
WeMasterTrade suits traders who run EAs, copy strategies, or systematic approaches — all three are explicitly permitted. News trading and overnight/weekend holding are allowed. The 5% daily drawdown and 10% max drawdown on the Challenge Package are among the more generous rule sets available at the $10K–$100K account tier.
The $100K maximum account size is lower than most competitors, but the $400K–$1,000,000 scaling path addresses this for traders who perform consistently. Daily payouts are available, which suits active traders who prefer not to wait on fixed withdrawal cycles.
Two-phase evaluation. Phase 1 target: 8%. Phase 2 target: 6%. Daily drawdown: 5%. Max drawdown: 10% (static, non-trailing). Leverage 1:100. Fees: $45–$320 (with 30% reset discount available). 30% profit split applies during the challenge phase. Funded phase split: 90%.
| Size | Fee | P1 Target | P2 Target | Daily DD | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $45 | 8% ($800) | 6% ($600) | 5% ($500) | 10% ($1,000) |
| $25,000 | $100 | 8% ($2,000) | 6% ($1,500) | 5% ($1,250) | 10% ($2,500) |
| $50,000 | $175 | 8% ($4,000) | 6% ($3,000) | 5% ($2,500) | 10% ($5,000) |
| $100,000 | $320 | 8% ($8,000) | 6% ($6,000) | 5% ($5,000) | 10% ($10,000) |
Skip the evaluation — immediate funded access. Fees $78–$780 for $10K–$100K accounts. Profit targets 6–10%. Daily drawdown 4–5%. Max drawdown 6–10%. Profit split 50–90% (scales with performance and account size). On-demand payouts.
Two platforms: MetaTrader 5 and MatchTrader. Note: MT5 is not available to US or Canadian residents. Instruments: forex, crypto, stocks, indices, metals, energy, commodities. EAs, copy trading, and automated strategies are all permitted. Hedging between accounts and martingale/gambling strategies are prohibited. No minimum trading days. Drawdown is static (non-trailing) — the maximum loss is fixed from initial balance, not from peak equity.
Restricted countries: USA (MT5 only), Canada (MT5 only), Russia, Israel, Vietnam, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Belarus, Venezuela, Yemen, and additional FATF-listed jurisdictions.
WeMasterTrade earns a 7.2 BestProp score. The 30% profit share during the challenge phase is the most trader-friendly evaluation structure we have reviewed — it turns the challenge fee into a recoverable cost rather than a sunk one. The 4.5/5 Trustpilot from 1,800+ reviews is solid independent validation. EA and copy trading permissions, static non-trailing drawdown, and daily payouts are all practical positives.
The $100K per-account ceiling is a meaningful limitation compared to competitors offering $200K–$400K base accounts. Instant Package fees ($78–$780) are high relative to the account sizes. Consistency rules apply on some models, and fees are non-refundable. For traders who want to recover their challenge cost while they evaluate, WeMasterTrade’s 30% challenge-phase split is a standout option.
Overall, our independent scoring gives FundingPips the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If WeMasterTrade better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, FundingPips scores higher overall (9.6/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
FundingPips offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.
FundingPips offers the higher profit split. FundingPips: 80% → 90%. WeMasterTrade: 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded).
EA policies: FundingPips — check the review. WeMasterTrade — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: FundingPips — check the review. WeMasterTrade — check the review.
Read the full FundingPips review → · Read the full WeMasterTrade review →
Based on our scoring methodology, FundingPips edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
FundingPips offers 80% → 90% profit split, while WeMasterTrade offers 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded) profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.
FundingPips processes first payouts in 5 day(s), while WeMasterTrade takes approximately a variable timeframe. Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither FundingPips nor WeMasterTrade are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
