Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | Mubite | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 70% → 90% | 80% → 90% |
| First Payout | — | 5 |
| Payout Frequency | On-demand (within 24h) | Every 5 days (Tuesdays) |
| Max Account Size | $200,000 | $100,000 |
In this independent head-to-head comparison of Mubite vs FundingPips, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
Mubite: Crypto Prop Trading, Three Ways In
FundingPips: The Fastest Payout Cycle in Prop Trading
Based on our independent scoring methodology, FundingPips scores 9.6/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: Mubite scores 8/10 vs FundingPips at 9.6/10.
Minimum Fee: Mubite starts from From $1,250 accounts; FundingPips starts from $36. FundingPips is cheaper at entry level.
Profit Split: Mubite offers 70% → 90%; FundingPips offers 80% → 90%. FundingPips has the higher split.
Platforms: Mubite supports Bybit, Cleo; FundingPips is on cTrader, Match Trader, MT5.
Tradeable Markets: Mubite covers Crypto (700+ markets); FundingPips offers Forex, Metals, Energy, Indices, Crypto.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how Mubite and FundingPips compare on pricing.
Mubite challenge fees start from From $1,250 accounts. The firm has operated since 2024.
FundingPips challenge fees start from $36. The firm has operated since 2022. Total payouts to date: $260M+.
On entry-level pricing, FundingPips offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.
Mubite profit split: 70% → 90%. FundingPips profit split: 80% → 90%. FundingPips delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: Mubite pays On-demand (within 24h); FundingPips pays Every 5 days (Tuesdays). Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of Mubite:
Mubite is a Prague-based cryptocurrency prop firm that launched in October 2024, making it one of the newer entrants in the funded trading space. Registered as Mubite s.r.o. in the Czech Republic — the same EU jurisdiction used by several established crypto prop firms — the company positions itself around real Bybit exchange integration, offering traders access to 700+ crypto markets without risking personal capital.
In its short operating history, Mubite has generated over 1,000 Trustpilot reviews (4.4/5) and awarded payouts ranging from $55 to over $41,000. The speed of growth is notable, though it also means the track record is still being established.
Mubite is built for crypto futures traders who want flexibility in how they enter the funded program. Unlike most prop firms that lock you into a fixed evaluation structure, Mubite offers three distinct paths: a traditional two-step evaluation for those who prefer lower fees, a one-step challenge for faster access, and an instant funding option for traders who want to skip evaluation entirely.
The firm suits traders with an established crypto strategy who want to choose their own risk-to-entry trade-off. It is not suitable for forex, stocks, or indices traders.
Mubite offers three funding models:
Account sizes run from $1,250 up to $200,000, with the $10,000 Instant Funding account priced at $440. Optional add-ons include a +20% profit split boost.
Mubite is built on two platforms:
The real Bybit integration is the core differentiator — funded traders are executing on live exchange infrastructure, not a simulated environment.
Note on payout history: Documented payout disputes were reported in January 2026. Mubite has responded publicly to these cases. As with any young prop firm, we recommend starting with a smaller account size to establish your own experience with their payout process before scaling.
Mubite earns a 6.8 BestProp score. The real Bybit integration, three flexible entry paths, and EU registration are genuine positives. The instant funding model is one of the more straightforward in the crypto prop space — no evaluation, no time pressure, just trade and withdraw.
The caution: Mubite is less than a year old with documented payout disputes on record. That does not make it a scam, but it does mean the track record is still forming. Experienced traders who understand the risk of a young firm and start with a moderate account size will find Mubite a genuinely interesting option. Those who need certainty should wait another 6–12 months for the track record to mature.
Here is our full independent review of FundingPips:
FundingPips launched in 2022 from Dubai and has since become one of the fastest-growing prop firms in the industry by a significant margin. The numbers are hard to argue with: $260M+ in total rewards paid to traders, 4.7/5 on Trustpilot from over 10,000 reviews, and a 5-day payout cycle that gives traders up to four withdrawals per month. For a firm founded three years ago, this is an exceptional track record.
CEO Khaled Ayesh is publicly visible and actively engaged with the trading community — a transparency marker that matters when evaluating younger firms. FundingPips also runs consistently among the lowest-fee prop firms in the space, with a $5,000 account available for $36.
FundingPips suits forex, commodities, and crypto traders who want a high-frequency payout cycle, permissive trading rules, and low entry costs. The 5-day payout schedule is the standout feature — if cash flow matters to your trading operation, getting paid every Tuesday rather than every two to four weeks is a meaningful difference.
EAs and expert advisors are permitted, news trading is allowed, and crypto trades 24/7 on weekends. The trailing drawdown is the main technical challenge — it follows your highest balance, not just the starting amount, which demands tighter ongoing risk management than static drawdown firms.
FundingPips uses a two-phase evaluation structure called Student → Practitioner → Master:
All fees are refunded after your 4th successful payout — effectively making the challenge free for traders who maintain funded status through four withdrawal cycles. FundingPips also offers 1-Step, Pro, and Zero program variants with different fee and rule structures — check their site for current availability and pricing on those formats.
| Account Size | Fee |
|---|---|
| $5,000 | $36 |
| $10,000 | $66 |
| $25,000 | $158 |
| $50,000 | $278 |
| $100,000 | $529 |
FundingPips earns an 8.8 BestProp score — the second-highest we award. The combination of $260M+ in proven payouts, 4.7/5 Trustpilot from 10,000+ verified reviews, industry-lowest fees, and a 5-day payout cycle makes it one of the most compelling prop firms available in 2026.
The trailing drawdown is the only significant challenge — it requires ongoing discipline to avoid giving back gains and seeing your drawdown limit tighten with every new high. Traders who understand trailing drawdown mechanics and manage it actively will find FundingPips one of the best-value funded trading programs on the market.
Overall, our independent scoring gives FundingPips the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If Mubite better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, FundingPips scores higher overall (9.6/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
FundingPips offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.
FundingPips offers the higher profit split. Mubite: 70% → 90%. FundingPips: 80% → 90%.
EA policies: Mubite — check the review. FundingPips — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: Mubite — check the review. FundingPips — check the review.
Read the full Mubite review → · Read the full FundingPips review →
Based on our scoring methodology, FundingPips edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
Mubite offers 70% → 90% profit split, while FundingPips offers 80% → 90% profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Yes! Mubite has code BESTPROP10. FundingPips has code 916E318D. Use these at checkout to save on your challenge fee.
Mubite processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while FundingPips takes approximately 5 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither Mubite nor FundingPips are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
