Prop Firms Challenges Comparisons Discount Codes Blog Contact
Home › Comparisons › Forexive vs Audacity Capital — Which is Better?
Forexive
7.4/10
★★★½☆
VS
Audacity Capital
7.8/10
★★★½☆

Forexive vs Audacity Capital — Which is Better? (2026)

Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.

Get Funded Now — Forexive View Firm — Audacity Capital

Forexive vs Audacity Capital — Side-by-Side

Feature Forexive Audacity Capital
Payout
Profit Split 80% (up to 95%) 50-95% (scales over time)
First Payout 14 14
Payout Frequency Bi-weekly Bi-weekly (Ability Challenge), Weekly (FTP)
Max Account Size $200,000 $240,000
Our Verdict — Forexive vs Audacity Capital

Winner: Audacity Capital

Forexive vs Audacity Capital — Executive Summary (2026)

In this independent head-to-head comparison of Forexive vs Audacity Capital, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.

Forexive: Est. Sep 2024, UK. Up to 95% Split. 2-Step 12% Max DD. EAs & Copy Trading OK.

Audacity Capital: One of the oldest prop firms globally, with generous drawdown limits and 12+ years of operation.

Based on our independent scoring methodology, Audacity Capital scores 7.8/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.

Quick Stats: Forexive vs Audacity Capital

BestProp Score: Forexive scores 7.4/10 vs Audacity Capital at 7.8/10.

Minimum Fee: Forexive starts from $49; Audacity Capital starts from $49. Audacity Capital is cheaper at entry level.

Profit Split: Forexive offers 80% (up to 95%); Audacity Capital offers 50-95% (scales over time). Forexive has the higher split.

Platforms: Forexive supports MT4, MT5; Audacity Capital is on MetaTrader 5.

Tradeable Markets: Forexive covers Forex only; Audacity Capital offers Forex, Metals, Indices.

Pricing Comparison: Forexive vs Audacity Capital

Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how Forexive and Audacity Capital compare on pricing.

Forexive challenge fees start from $49. The firm has operated since 2024.

Audacity Capital challenge fees start from $49. The firm has operated since 2012. They have funded over 500,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $250,000,000+.

On entry-level pricing, Audacity Capital offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.

Challenge Rules: Forexive vs Audacity Capital

Drawdown Rules

Trading Conditions

Payout Comparison: Forexive vs Audacity Capital

Forexive profit split: 80% (up to 95%). Audacity Capital profit split: 50-95% (scales over time). Forexive delivers the higher cut to traders.

Payout frequency: Forexive pays Bi-weekly; Audacity Capital pays Bi-weekly (Ability Challenge), Weekly (FTP). Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.

Forexive — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of Forexive:

Introduction to Forexive

Forexive Ltd (Company No. 15746920) was founded on 30 September 2024 and is registered in the United Kingdom, led by CEO Hooman Abbasi. The firm operates from Czech Republic and is active in 180+ countries with a team of 100+. Forexive offers two evaluation tracks (1-Step and 2-Step) with a top split reaching 95% and a maximum initial account of $250,000, scaling to $2,000,000. All accounts run on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Instruments are currently limited to Forex only.

As a September 2024 launch, Forexive has a very limited public operating history. TheTrustedProp’s verification score of 60/100 (Average) reflects this early-stage status. The firm offers swap-free accounts, copy trading, and EA support as standard, with a commission of $3 per round lot.

Programs

1-Step Challenge ($65-$1,099 for $5K-$200K): Single phase, 10% profit target. Daily loss: 3% (equity-based static). Max drawdown: 6% (equity-based static). Leverage: 1:50 standard, 1:30 swing. Minimum 3 profitable trading days. Profit split: 80-95%. Unlimited time. No consistency rule published. Best for traders who prefer a single-phase evaluation with moderate drawdown parameters.

2-Step Challenge ($49-$999 for $5K-$200K): Phase 1: 10% target. Phase 2: 5% target. Daily loss: 5% (equity-based static). Max drawdown: 12% (equity-based static — one of the widest buffers in the 2-Step category). Leverage: 1:100 standard, 1:30 swing. Minimum 3 profitable trading days. Profit split: 80-95%. Unlimited time. The 12% max drawdown gives traders significant room to manage normal drawdown cycles across both evaluation phases.

Trading Rules

  • EAs/Algos: Permitted.
  • Copy trading: Permitted.
  • Swap-free accounts: Available.
  • News trading: Permitted (confirm specific blackout rules if any with support).
  • Drawdown type: Equity-based static on both programs.
  • Commission: $3 per round lot (applies on both MT4 and MT5).
  • Scaling: From $250K initial maximum to $2,000,000.
  • Instruments: Forex only — no indices, metals, crypto, or commodities currently.

Platforms and Instruments

Platforms: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Instruments: Forex only. Spreads from 0.0 pips. Match Trader and cTrader are listed as coming soon — the platform roadmap suggests expansion is planned but not yet available. Leverage up to 1:100 (2-Step) and 1:50 (1-Step).

Payouts

  • Frequency: Bi-weekly (every 14 days), on-demand also available
  • Processing: Within 24 hours
  • Methods: USDT TRC20, USDC ETH, BTC, ETH, LTC, Rise, Bank Wire Transfer
  • Minimum withdrawal: Not specified — confirm on Forexive website

Our Verdict

Forexive earns a 6.0 BestProp score. The 2-Step 12% maximum drawdown is genuinely competitive — matching FundsCap’s industry-leading buffer at comparable fees. The 95% maximum profit split is among the highest published by any prop firm. EAs, copy trading, and swap-free accounts are all standard. Multiple crypto and bank payout methods add withdrawal flexibility.

The primary concerns: Forexive launched in September 2024 and has less than a year of operation at publication. TheTrustedProp’s 60/100 verification score is average and reflects the limited track record. Instruments are restricted to Forex only — no metals, indices, or crypto — which eliminates the firm for multi-asset traders. The $3/lot commission adds ongoing cost for active traders. Platforms beyond MT4/MT5 are still listed as coming soon. The customer rating of 4.1/5 is modest compared to established competitors. The combination of very young age, Forex-only instruments, and average trust score makes Forexive a monitored watch rather than a confident first-choice recommendation at this stage.

Audacity Capital — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of Audacity Capital:

Overview

Audacity Capital was founded in 2012, making it one of the longest-running prop trading firms in the world. UK-registered (Companies House 11652683) under CEO Karim Yousfi, the firm claims over $250 million paid out to traders and 500,000+ funded traders globally — numbers built over more than a decade of operation. The firm offers three programs: the 2-phase Ability Challenge, the 1-step Ability One, and the Funded Trader Program (FTP / Instant Funding).

Programs

The Ability Challenge is a two-phase evaluation. Phase 1 requires a 10% profit target with a 7.5% daily drawdown and 15% max drawdown — among the most generous drawdown limits in the industry. Phase 2 requires 5% with tighter 5%/10% limits. The Ability One is a single-phase evaluation with a 10% target, 3% daily, and 6% max drawdown. The FTP (Instant Funding) provides immediate funded access with up to 95% profit split and weekly payouts.

Trailing Drawdown Warning

The Ability Challenge uses a trailing drawdown that resets daily when equity hits new highs. This mechanism confuses some traders — the daily limit recalculates at each new equity peak, meaning a trader can technically be in breach even while net-profitable over the full period. Review the drawdown rules carefully before trading.

Trading Rules

News trading is allowed on the Ability Challenge without restrictions. The FTP requires a 30-minute waiting period after major economic events. EAs and copy trading are permitted. HFT, cross-account hedging, and martingale strategies are prohibited. Traders from the US, Syria, Iran, and North Korea cannot access the platform.

Payouts

Ability Challenge payouts are made every 14 days via bank wire, Wise, PayPal, or crypto. The profit split starts at 50-75% on the Ability Challenge and scales to 95% over time. FTP accounts pay weekly at up to 95% immediately.

Trustpilot Note

Trustpilot score is 3.4/5 from 1,067 reviews. While the majority of reviews are positive, approximately 125 are 1-star — prospective traders should review recent trader experiences before committing to the platform.

Forexive — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 7.4/10
  • Competitive 80% (up to 95%) profit split
  • Challenge fees from $49
  • Available on MT4, MT5
  • Operating since 2024

Audacity Capital — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 7.8/10
  • Competitive 50-95% (scales over time) profit split
  • Challenge fees from $49
  • 500,000+ funded traders
  • $250,000,000+ total paid out
  • Available on MetaTrader 5
  • Operating since 2012

Final Verdict: Forexive vs Audacity Capital (2026)

Overall, our independent scoring gives Audacity Capital the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If Forexive better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.

Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.

Frequently Asked Questions: Forexive vs Audacity Capital

Which is better, Forexive or Audacity Capital?

Based on our independent scoring, Audacity Capital scores higher overall (7.8/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.

Is Forexive cheaper than Audacity Capital?

Audacity Capital offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.

Which has a better profit split, Forexive or Audacity Capital?

Forexive offers the higher profit split. Forexive: 80% (up to 95%). Audacity Capital: 50-95% (scales over time).

Can I use an EA or trading bot?

EA policies: Forexive — check the review. Audacity Capital — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.

Which is better for news trading?

News trading: Forexive — check the review. Audacity Capital — check the review.

Read the full Forexive review →  ·  Read the full Audacity Capital review →

Who should choose Forexive?
  • Traders wanting 80% (up to 95%) profit split
  • Users of MT4, MT5
  • Anyone looking for a solid funded challenge
Who should choose Audacity Capital?
  • Traders wanting 50-95% (scales over time) profit split
  • Users of MetaTrader 5
  • Anyone looking for a solid funded challenge

Frequently Asked Questions — Forexive vs Audacity Capital

Based on our scoring methodology, Audacity Capital edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.

Forexive offers 80% (up to 95%) profit split, while Audacity Capital offers 50-95% (scales over time) profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.

Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.

Forexive processes first payouts in 14 day(s), while Audacity Capital takes approximately 14 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.

Neither Forexive nor Audacity Capital are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.

Forexive
7.4/10
Read Review →
Audacity Capital
7.8/10
Read Review →