Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | WeMasterTrade | iFunds |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded) | 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen) |
| First Payout | — | On demand |
| Payout Frequency | On-demand / Daily | On demand |
| Max Account Size | $100,000 | $500,000 |
Winner: WeMasterTrade
In this independent head-to-head comparison of WeMasterTrade vs iFunds, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
WeMasterTrade: 30% Profit Share During the Challenge. EAs & Copy Trading Allowed.
iFunds: No Evaluation. Choose Your Own Max DD. 50-80% Split. 24h Payout Guarantee.
Based on our independent scoring methodology, WeMasterTrade scores 8.3/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: WeMasterTrade scores 8.3/10 vs iFunds at 7.8/10.
Minimum Fee: WeMasterTrade starts from $45; iFunds starts from $250. WeMasterTrade is cheaper at entry level.
Profit Split: WeMasterTrade offers 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded); iFunds offers 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen). iFunds has the higher split.
Platforms: WeMasterTrade supports MT5, MatchTrader; iFunds is on MT4, MT5.
Tradeable Markets: WeMasterTrade covers Forex, Crypto, Stocks, Indices, Metals, Energy, Commodities; iFunds offers Forex, Metals, Energies, Crypto, Stocks.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how WeMasterTrade and iFunds compare on pricing.
WeMasterTrade challenge fees start from $45. The firm has operated since 2020.
iFunds challenge fees start from $250. The firm has operated since 2024.
On entry-level pricing, WeMasterTrade offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.
WeMasterTrade profit split: 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded). iFunds profit split: 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen). iFunds delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: WeMasterTrade pays On-demand / Daily; iFunds pays On demand. Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of WeMasterTrade:
WeMasterTrade was founded in 2020 under WeCopy Fintech Inc (registered in Vancouver, Canada) with prop trading operations running through Dubai (IFZA license 66242) and Saint Lucia entities. CEO Andrew Anth leads a platform with a Trustpilot score of 4.5/5 from 1,800+ reviews — solid independent validation for a firm of this size.
The platform has one genuinely unusual feature that sets it apart from every other firm in our database: traders earn a 30% profit share during the challenge phase itself — before passing, before getting funded. Most firms pay nothing during evaluation. WeMasterTrade pays 30% on challenge profits from day one. This meaningfully changes the risk calculus of taking a challenge: the fee has a realistic chance of being partially or fully recovered through challenge-phase earnings even if the trader doesn’t ultimately pass.
A second distinctive feature: the firm’s algorithm copies trader positions to live firm accounts in parallel — meaning the activity on funded accounts has real market consequences, not just simulated bookkeeping.
WeMasterTrade suits traders who run EAs, copy strategies, or systematic approaches — all three are explicitly permitted. News trading and overnight/weekend holding are allowed. The 5% daily drawdown and 10% max drawdown on the Challenge Package are among the more generous rule sets available at the $10K–$100K account tier.
The $100K maximum account size is lower than most competitors, but the $400K–$1,000,000 scaling path addresses this for traders who perform consistently. Daily payouts are available, which suits active traders who prefer not to wait on fixed withdrawal cycles.
Two-phase evaluation. Phase 1 target: 8%. Phase 2 target: 6%. Daily drawdown: 5%. Max drawdown: 10% (static, non-trailing). Leverage 1:100. Fees: $45–$320 (with 30% reset discount available). 30% profit split applies during the challenge phase. Funded phase split: 90%.
| Size | Fee | P1 Target | P2 Target | Daily DD | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $45 | 8% ($800) | 6% ($600) | 5% ($500) | 10% ($1,000) |
| $25,000 | $100 | 8% ($2,000) | 6% ($1,500) | 5% ($1,250) | 10% ($2,500) |
| $50,000 | $175 | 8% ($4,000) | 6% ($3,000) | 5% ($2,500) | 10% ($5,000) |
| $100,000 | $320 | 8% ($8,000) | 6% ($6,000) | 5% ($5,000) | 10% ($10,000) |
Skip the evaluation — immediate funded access. Fees $78–$780 for $10K–$100K accounts. Profit targets 6–10%. Daily drawdown 4–5%. Max drawdown 6–10%. Profit split 50–90% (scales with performance and account size). On-demand payouts.
Two platforms: MetaTrader 5 and MatchTrader. Note: MT5 is not available to US or Canadian residents. Instruments: forex, crypto, stocks, indices, metals, energy, commodities. EAs, copy trading, and automated strategies are all permitted. Hedging between accounts and martingale/gambling strategies are prohibited. No minimum trading days. Drawdown is static (non-trailing) — the maximum loss is fixed from initial balance, not from peak equity.
Restricted countries: USA (MT5 only), Canada (MT5 only), Russia, Israel, Vietnam, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Belarus, Venezuela, Yemen, and additional FATF-listed jurisdictions.
WeMasterTrade earns a 7.2 BestProp score. The 30% profit share during the challenge phase is the most trader-friendly evaluation structure we have reviewed — it turns the challenge fee into a recoverable cost rather than a sunk one. The 4.5/5 Trustpilot from 1,800+ reviews is solid independent validation. EA and copy trading permissions, static non-trailing drawdown, and daily payouts are all practical positives.
The $100K per-account ceiling is a meaningful limitation compared to competitors offering $200K–$400K base accounts. Instant Package fees ($78–$780) are high relative to the account sizes. Consistency rules apply on some models, and fees are non-refundable. For traders who want to recover their challenge cost while they evaluate, WeMasterTrade’s 30% challenge-phase split is a standout option.
Here is our full independent review of iFunds:
iFunds is operated by iFunds Ltd (Saint Lucia, Registration No. 2024-00154) and Synerjic Ltd (Cyprus, Registration No. 474148), led by CEO Layth Sanjaq. The firm offers a purely instant-funded model — there is no evaluation phase. Traders receive capital immediately and configure their own risk parameters at purchase. iFunds holds a 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating with 93% five-star reviews. Maximum account size is $500,000. Payouts are processed within 24 hours, with a 10% bonus (up to $1,000) if the 24-hour window is missed.
The defining feature of iFunds is its customizable risk-reward model: traders select their maximum drawdown threshold at account purchase (between 6% and 10% of initial balance). A lower chosen drawdown ceiling yields a higher profit split; a higher drawdown tolerance yields a lower split. This places risk management directly in the trader’s hands from day one.
No evaluation. No profit target to begin trading. Traders select a max drawdown level — the lower the max DD they accept, the higher their profit share. The exact split-to-DD mapping is:
There is no daily loss limit on any iFunds account — only the chosen maximum drawdown applies. This gives traders full intraday flexibility; only the total equity drop from the starting balance is monitored.
Note: fees represent a meaningful percentage of account size on smaller accounts ($250 for $2,500 = 10%). This is consistent with instant-funded models where no evaluation filters risk, and reflects the immediacy of funded access. Fees are described as a participation fee — refund terms are governed by iFunds’ separate Refund Policy.
Platforms: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Instruments: Stocks, currencies, metals, energies, cryptocurrencies. Leverage: up to 1:100 (dynamic, based on risk level). All instruments accessible on both platforms with the same account.
iFunds earns a 6.5 BestProp score. The customizable risk-reward model is genuinely innovative — letting traders choose their own drawdown tolerance and receive a commensurate profit share puts risk management in the right hands. 4.7/5 Trustpilot with 93% five-star reviews is excellent for a 2024-registered firm. No daily loss limit provides real intraday freedom. EAs, news trading, trade copiers, and multi-IP are all permitted with minimal restrictions. On-demand payouts with a 24-hour guarantee and bonus incentive are strong operational commitments.
The main caution is the fee-to-account-size ratio on small accounts: $250 for a $2,500 funded account is a 10% upfront cost, and the base profit split at the highest drawdown tolerance is only 50%. Traders who want immediate funding of small accounts should run the numbers carefully — at 50% split and $250 fee, the break-even is $500 in gross profit (1 * fee * 2), meaning the account must gain 20% before the trader recups the fee net of split. iFunds works best for confident, disciplined traders who can accept tight drawdown limits in exchange for a higher profit share, or those with access to automated strategies that benefit from no daily DD restriction. The 2024 registration means the track record, while so far positive, is less than two years old.
Overall, our independent scoring gives WeMasterTrade the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If iFunds better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, WeMasterTrade scores higher overall (8.3/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
WeMasterTrade offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.
iFunds offers the higher profit split. WeMasterTrade: 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded). iFunds: 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen).
EA policies: WeMasterTrade — check the review. iFunds — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: WeMasterTrade — check the review. iFunds — check the review.
Read the full WeMasterTrade review → · Read the full iFunds review →
Based on our scoring methodology, WeMasterTrade edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
WeMasterTrade offers 30% (challenge) → 90% (funded) profit split, while iFunds offers 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen) profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.
WeMasterTrade processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while iFunds takes approximately On demand day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither WeMasterTrade nor iFunds are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
