Prop Firms Challenges Comparisons Discount Codes Blog Contact
Home › Comparisons › Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures — Which is Better?
Alpha Capital Group
8.9/10
★★★★½
VS
FXIFY Futures
8.4/10
★★★★☆

Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures — Which is Better? (2026)

Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.

Get Funded Now — Alpha Capital Group View Firm — FXIFY Futures

Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures — Side-by-Side

Feature Alpha Capital Group FXIFY Futures
Payout
Profit Split 80% 80% → 100%
First Payout — 14
Payout Frequency Bi-weekly or on-demand From day 14 (24-48h processing)
Max Account Size $200,000 $150,000
Our Verdict — Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures

Winner: Alpha Capital Group

Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures — Executive Summary (2026)

In this independent head-to-head comparison of Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.

Alpha Capital Group: Four Evaluation Paths. One Million Traders. $100M Paid.

FXIFY Futures: CME Futures. NinjaTrader + Tradovate + TradingView. $35M+ Paid.

Based on our independent scoring methodology, Alpha Capital Group scores 8.9/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.

Quick Stats: Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures

BestProp Score: Alpha Capital Group scores 8.9/10 vs FXIFY Futures at 8.4/10.

Minimum Fee: Alpha Capital Group starts from $50; FXIFY Futures starts from —.

Profit Split: Alpha Capital Group offers 80%; FXIFY Futures offers 80% → 100%. FXIFY Futures has the higher split.

Platforms: Alpha Capital Group supports MT5, cTrader, DXtrade; FXIFY Futures is on NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView.

Tradeable Markets: Alpha Capital Group covers Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities; FXIFY Futures offers CME Futures.

Pricing Comparison: Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures

Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how Alpha Capital Group and FXIFY Futures compare on pricing.

Alpha Capital Group challenge fees start from $50. The firm has operated since 2021. They have funded over 1,200,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $100M+.

FXIFY Futures challenge fees start from —. The firm has operated since 2025. Total payouts to date: $35,000,000+.

Challenge Rules: Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures

Drawdown Rules

Trading Conditions

Payout Comparison: Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures

Alpha Capital Group profit split: 80%. FXIFY Futures profit split: 80% → 100%. FXIFY Futures delivers the higher cut to traders.

Payout frequency: Alpha Capital Group pays Bi-weekly or on-demand; FXIFY Futures pays From day 14 (24-48h processing). Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.

Alpha Capital Group — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of Alpha Capital Group:

Introduction to Alpha Capital Group

Alpha Capital Group is a UK-based prop firm founded in November 2021 by George Kohler and Andrew Blaylock. With 1.2 million+ traders across 140+ countries and $100M+ in performance fees paid out, it is one of the largest prop firms by trader count outside of FTMO. The firm offers four evaluation paths — Alpha One, Alpha Pro, Alpha Swing, and Alpha Three — each with distinct drawdown structures and profit target sequences, giving traders more genuine program diversity than most competitors.

The firm’s broker arm, ACG Markets, is licensed in Seychelles, providing the regulated infrastructure behind the simulated trading environment. Note: Alpha Capital Group does not accept US residents or citizens.

Who Is Alpha Capital Group For?

Alpha Capital Group suits non-US forex and multi-asset traders who want to choose between trailing and static drawdown structures based on their strategy. The Alpha One trailing drawdown — which locks permanently at the starting balance once you are 6% in profit — is one of the most trader-friendly trailing drawdown structures in the industry: the trailing period ends once you clear the threshold, removing the risk of giving back gains indefinitely.

The three Alpha Pro variants (6%, 8%, 10% targets) also give traders genuine control over the difficulty/cost trade-off, rather than a single fixed evaluation path.

Challenge Programs

Alpha Capital Group offers four evaluation paths:

  • Alpha One (1-Step): 10% profit target. Trailing drawdown at 6% — once your account reaches +6% profit, the trailing floor locks permanently at your starting balance. 4% daily drawdown. Minimum 1 trading day. Fees from $50 ($5K account), $297 for $50K.
  • Alpha Pro (2-Step, 3 variants):
    • Pro 6%: Phase 1: 6%, Phase 2: 6%. Static 6% max drawdown. 3% daily drawdown.
    • Pro 8%: Phase 1: 8%, Phase 2: 5%. Static 8% max drawdown. 4% daily drawdown.
    • Pro 10%: Phase 1: 10%, Phase 2: 5%. Static 10% max drawdown. 5% daily drawdown.
    • All Pro variants: minimum 3 trading days per phase. $197 for $25K account.
  • Alpha Swing (2-Step): Phase 1: 10%, Phase 2: 5%. Static 10% max drawdown. 5% daily drawdown. Minimum 3 days per phase. $577 for $100K account. Designed for swing traders holding positions longer-term.
  • Alpha Three (3-Step): Phase 1: 8%, Phase 2: 4%, Phase 3: 4%. Static 6% max drawdown. 4% daily drawdown. Minimum 3 days per phase. Three-phase progression for the most conservative evaluation path.

Trading Rules

  • Best Day Rule: No single trading day can exceed 40% of total cumulative profit — applies to on-demand payout requests
  • On-demand payouts: Require minimum 2% gross profit on the account and must pass the 40% Best Day Rule
  • Bi-weekly payouts: $100 minimum, 5 trading days required before first request
  • No time limits on any evaluation phase
  • US residents/citizens: Not eligible for any program
  • Max allocation: $400,000 across all accounts combined

Platforms and Instruments

Three platforms supported: MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — covering the full range of preferences from legacy MetaTrader users to modern platform traders. Instruments include forex pairs, metals, indices, and commodities. Spreads from 0 pips with zero commission.

Payouts

  • Profit split: 80% on all programs
  • Frequency: On-demand or bi-weekly
  • Methods: Bank wire (Rise), crypto
  • Payment accepted: Crypto, credit/debit card, PayPal
  • Total paid out: $100M+ in performance fees

Our Verdict

Alpha Capital Group earns an 8.0 BestProp score. The 1.2M+ trader base and $100M+ in payouts establish it as one of the most proven mid-tier prop firms available. The program diversity — four evaluation paths with three Pro variants — is genuinely useful rather than marketing noise, and the Alpha One trailing drawdown lock is one of the most intelligent trailing structures we have seen.

The 80% maximum split (no path to 90%+) and the Best Day Rule on on-demand withdrawals are the main limitations. For non-US traders who want program flexibility and a proven track record at competitive fees, Alpha Capital Group is a strong choice.

FXIFY Futures — Full Review

Here is our full independent review of FXIFY Futures:

Introduction to FXIFY Futures

FXIFY Futures Limited is the futures-dedicated arm of the FXIFY brand, launched in January 2025 and headquartered in Dublin, Ireland. Separate from the main FXIFY CFD platform, FXIFY Futures focuses exclusively on CME-listed contracts tradeable through NinjaTrader, Tradovate, and TradingView. Despite being one of the newer futures prop firms, it has already distributed $35M+ in verified payouts — a strong output for a platform less than 18 months old.

Free Level 1 market data is included on all plans, and instant credential issuance means traders can be in the market within minutes of purchase. The maximum simulated capital ceiling is $750,000.

Who Is FXIFY Futures For?

FXIFY Futures is built for futures traders who want clean programme structures, multiple platform choices, and the credibility of a firm backed by the established FXIFY ecosystem. Three platforms — NinjaTrader 8, Tradovate, and TradingView — cover the main futures trading environments without forcing traders into proprietary software.

The drawdown rules are strict by futures standards: 3–4% max drawdown on EOD (end-of-day) basis. Traders who are used to the dollar-based drawdowns typical of US futures firms will find FXIFY Futures more demanding. The trade-off is a cleaner, percentage-based framework that is consistent across account sizes.

Challenge Programs

  • Standard Plan (1-Step, $50K–$150K): Profit target 6–7%. Max drawdown 3–4% (EOD). Minimum 3 trading days. 80% profit split, upgradeable to 90% at checkout. Discounted reset available. Activation fee removable at checkout.
  • Expert Plan ($50K–$150K): Same account sizes and drawdown structure as Standard. 90% profit split by default, upgradeable to 100%. Zero activation fees.
  • Direct to Sim Live (Instant Funding): Skip the evaluation — access funded capital immediately. 14-day minimum trading period before first payout. 80–90% split depending on configuration.

All plans: free Level 1 market data included. First payout available from day 14, processed within 24–48 hours. Scaling ceiling: $750,000 in simulated capital.

Trading Rules and Platforms

Three platforms: NinjaTrader 8, Tradovate, TradingView. Instruments: CME-listed futures contracts. EOD (end-of-day) drawdown calculation — the daily loss limit resets at end of trading day rather than being a live intraday trailing figure. No maximum on trading days.

Drawdown of 3–4% max is among the tightest in the futures prop space — traders who run high-variance intraday strategies should size conservatively on this platform.

Payouts

  • First payout: Available from day 14 on funded accounts
  • Processing: 24–48 hours after request
  • Split: 80% (Standard) | 90% (Expert default) | 100% (Expert upgrade)
  • Methods: Crypto, bank wire transfer
  • Total verified: $35M+
  • Maximum capital: $750,000

Our Verdict

FXIFY Futures earns a 7.3 BestProp score. The FXIFY brand backing, Dublin HQ, $35M+ paid out in under 18 months, and three strong futures platform options (including TradingView) are solid foundations. The Expert Plan’s 90% default split — upgradeable to 100% with zero activation fees — is competitive. Free Level 1 data and instant credential issuance remove common friction points.

The 3–4% EOD max drawdown is the most restrictive limit across all futures firms we have reviewed and will not suit high-variance trading styles. Account size range ($50K–$150K base) is limited compared to firms offering $25K entry points or $400K+ ceilings. For disciplined futures traders who can operate within tight drawdown parameters and want a credible EU-based firm, FXIFY Futures is a strong option.

Alpha Capital Group — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 8.9/10
  • Competitive 80% profit split
  • Challenge fees from $50
  • 1,200,000+ funded traders
  • $100M+ total paid out
  • Available on MT5, cTrader, DXtrade
  • Operating since 2021

FXIFY Futures — Key Strengths

  • BestProp score: 8.4/10
  • Competitive 80% → 100% profit split
  • Challenge fees from —
  • $35,000,000+ total paid out
  • Available on NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView
  • Operating since 2025

Final Verdict: Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures (2026)

Overall, our independent scoring gives Alpha Capital Group the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If FXIFY Futures better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.

Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.

Frequently Asked Questions: Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures

Which is better, Alpha Capital Group or FXIFY Futures?

Based on our independent scoring, Alpha Capital Group scores higher overall (8.9/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.

Is Alpha Capital Group cheaper than FXIFY Futures?

Both firms have similar entry-level pricing. Compare the full fee schedule for your target account size.

Which has a better profit split, Alpha Capital Group or FXIFY Futures?

FXIFY Futures offers the higher profit split. Alpha Capital Group: 80%. FXIFY Futures: 80% → 100%.

Can I use an EA or trading bot?

EA policies: Alpha Capital Group — check the review. FXIFY Futures — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.

Which is better for news trading?

News trading: Alpha Capital Group — check the review. FXIFY Futures — check the review.

Read the full Alpha Capital Group review →  ·  Read the full FXIFY Futures review →

Who should choose Alpha Capital Group?
  • Traders wanting 80% profit split
  • Users of MT5, cTrader, DXtrade
  • Anyone looking for a top-rated funded challenge
Who should choose FXIFY Futures?
  • Traders wanting 80% → 100% profit split
  • Users of NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView
  • Anyone looking for a top-rated funded challenge

Frequently Asked Questions — Alpha Capital Group vs FXIFY Futures

Based on our scoring methodology, Alpha Capital Group edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.

Alpha Capital Group offers 80% profit split, while FXIFY Futures offers 80% → 100% profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.

Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.

Alpha Capital Group processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while FXIFY Futures takes approximately 14 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.

Neither Alpha Capital Group nor FXIFY Futures are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.

Alpha Capital Group
8.9/10
Read Review →
FXIFY Futures
8.4/10
Read Review →