Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | Klein Funding | Blueberry Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 40% → 70% | 80% → 90% |
| First Payout | — | 14 |
| Payout Frequency | On-demand | Bi-weekly (7-day and on-demand available) |
| Max Account Size | $200,000 | $200,000 |
Winner: Blueberry Funded
In this independent head-to-head comparison of Klein Funding vs Blueberry Funded, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
Klein Funding: Set Your Own Risk, Trade Crypto Your Way
Blueberry Funded: Broker-Backed Prop Trading. ASIC-Regulated Foundation.
Based on our independent scoring methodology, Blueberry Funded scores 8.6/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: Klein Funding scores 7.8/10 vs Blueberry Funded at 8.6/10.
Minimum Fee: Klein Funding starts from Trading fees only; Blueberry Funded starts from $145.
Profit Split: Klein Funding offers 40% → 70%; Blueberry Funded offers 80% → 90%. Blueberry Funded has the higher split.
Platforms: Klein Funding supports Bybit; Blueberry Funded is on MT4, MT5, DXtrade, TradeLocker.
Tradeable Markets: Klein Funding covers Crypto (700+ pairs); Blueberry Funded offers Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how Klein Funding and Blueberry Funded compare on pricing.
Klein Funding challenge fees start from Trading fees only. The firm has operated since 2024.
Blueberry Funded challenge fees start from $145. The firm has operated since 2024. They have funded over 15,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $8M+.
Klein Funding profit split: 40% → 70%. Blueberry Funded profit split: 80% → 90%. Blueberry Funded delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: Klein Funding pays On-demand; Blueberry Funded pays Bi-weekly (7-day and on-demand available). Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of Klein Funding:
Klein Funding is a London-based cryptocurrency prop firm founded in November 2024 by David Allard. It operates in the same Prague-adjacent EU-registered crypto prop firm category as HyroTrader and Mubite, but with one notable structural difference: rather than charging upfront challenge fees, Klein Funding’s costs come from Bybit exchange maker/taker fees (0.02% maker, 0.055% taker) accrued during trading. This makes it one of the few prop firms where the barrier to entry is behaviour, not capital.
The firm is still building its verified track record, but has accumulated a 4.9/5 customer rating across review platforms and offers one of the more flexible challenge structures in the crypto prop space — including a customisable drawdown system where traders set their own risk parameters.
Klein Funding is designed for cryptocurrency futures traders who want to choose their own risk profile rather than accept a fixed set of rules. The customisable drawdown model — where you set your maximum drawdown between 6% and 14%, with the profit target adjusting accordingly — suits traders who know their strategy’s risk parameters and want the rules to match them.
It is not suitable for forex, stocks, or indices traders, and traders who rely on automated systems, copy trading, or high-frequency strategies should note these are restricted. The firm is very young, which means the payout track record is still forming — experienced traders who prefer certainty may want to wait for more data.
Klein Funding offers four paths to funding:
Evaluation accounts range from $6,000 to $200,000. Challenge costs come from Bybit trading fees rather than upfront registration fees — check the Klein Funding website for the current fee structure as it may have been updated.
Klein Funding’s standout feature is its customisable risk system. You can set your maximum drawdown anywhere between 6% and 14%, and the profit target adjusts in proportion. Choosing a tighter drawdown (6%) means a lower profit target; choosing a looser drawdown (14%) means a higher target. Daily drawdown is always set at half your chosen maximum drawdown.
This is genuinely useful for systematic traders who know their strategy’s expected maximum drawdown and don’t want to be disqualified by an arbitrary rule that doesn’t match their approach.
The base 40% profit split on challenge accounts is below the industry standard of 70–80% seen at most competitors. Klein Funding’s model is structured differently to most — lower upfront costs but a lower initial split — so factor this into your overall return calculation before committing.
Klein Funding earns a 6.5 BestProp score. The customisable drawdown system is a genuinely innovative feature, the no-upfront-fee model lowers the barrier to entry, and the Instant Pro scaling path to $2M is ambitious. These are real positives.
The significant caution: Klein Funding launched in November 2024 and has no published track record of total payouts or funded trader numbers. The base 40% profit split on challenge accounts is the lowest we have reviewed. For traders who want to try the customisable drawdown model, starting with Instant Pro (70% split) rather than the evaluation path makes more financial sense until the firm establishes a longer track record.
Here is our full independent review of Blueberry Funded:
Blueberry Funded launched in August 2024 as the prop trading arm of Blueberry Markets — an ASIC-regulated forex broker with an established reputation in the retail trading space. This broker-backed structure is the firm’s defining credential: unlike standalone prop firms, Blueberry Funded operates from a foundation of regulatory oversight and institutional-grade infrastructure that most prop firm startups cannot match.
With 15,000+ active traders and $8M+ in payouts at under a year old, the growth trajectory is strong. The five-program structure — from beginner instant accounts to a Prime 2-Step challenge — gives traders more entry options than most competitors.
Blueberry Funded suits forex and multi-asset traders who value the credibility of a broker-backed firm over lower fees or faster payouts. The ASIC-regulated parent company brings compliance standards and infrastructure that independent prop firms typically lack — a meaningful differentiator for traders who have concerns about firm legitimacy.
The firm also stands out for permitting martingale and grid trading strategies — approaches banned at most prop firms. If your strategy relies on these methods, Blueberry Funded is one of very few funded trading programs that will accept your application.
Blueberry Funded offers five paths to funding:
Account sizes from $1,250 to $200,000 across all programs. No time limits on any challenge phase.
Blueberry Funded supports four platforms: MT4, MT5, DXtrade, and TradeLocker — one of the broader platform selections available, catering to both legacy MetaTrader users and traders on newer platforms. Instruments cover forex pairs, metals, indices, commodities, and crypto.
Blueberry Funded earns a 7.6 BestProp score. The ASIC-regulated broker backing is the headline feature — it provides structural credibility that independent prop firms cannot replicate, and for traders who prioritise legitimacy above all else, that matters. The martingale and grid permission is also genuinely rare and valuable for traders who use those approaches.
The trade-offs are a 4.1/5 Trustpilot rating (below the industry leaders), a 14-day default payout cycle, and relatively low crypto leverage (1:2). Founded in August 2024, the track record is still building. As the firm matures under its regulated parent, these scores should improve — Blueberry Funded is one to watch as much as one to join now.
Overall, our independent scoring gives Blueberry Funded the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If Klein Funding better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, Blueberry Funded scores higher overall (8.6/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
Both firms have similar entry-level pricing. Compare the full fee schedule for your target account size.
Blueberry Funded offers the higher profit split. Klein Funding: 40% → 70%. Blueberry Funded: 80% → 90%.
EA policies: Klein Funding — check the review. Blueberry Funded — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: Klein Funding — check the review. Blueberry Funded — check the review.
Read the full Klein Funding review → · Read the full Blueberry Funded review →
Based on our scoring methodology, Blueberry Funded edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
Klein Funding offers 40% → 70% profit split, while Blueberry Funded offers 80% → 90% profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Yes! Blueberry Funded has code BESTPROP. Use these at checkout to save on your challenge fee.
Klein Funding processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while Blueberry Funded takes approximately 14 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither Klein Funding nor Blueberry Funded are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
