Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | Klein Funding | RebelsFunding |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 40% → 70% | 75% → 90% |
| First Payout | — | 14 |
| Payout Frequency | On-demand | On-demand (avg 12h) |
| Max Account Size | $200,000 | $320,000 |
Winner: RebelsFunding
In this independent head-to-head comparison of Klein Funding vs RebelsFunding, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
Klein Funding: Set Your Own Risk, Trade Crypto Your Way
RebelsFunding: No Time Limits. Your Pace. Your Rules.
Based on our independent scoring methodology, RebelsFunding scores 8.5/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: Klein Funding scores 7.8/10 vs RebelsFunding at 8.5/10.
Minimum Fee: Klein Funding starts from Trading fees only; RebelsFunding starts from $25.
Profit Split: Klein Funding offers 40% → 70%; RebelsFunding offers 75% → 90%. RebelsFunding has the higher split.
Platforms: Klein Funding supports Bybit; RebelsFunding is on RF-Trader (TradingView-based).
Tradeable Markets: Klein Funding covers Crypto (700+ pairs); RebelsFunding offers Forex, Metals, Indices, Energies, Stocks, Crypto.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how Klein Funding and RebelsFunding compare on pricing.
Klein Funding challenge fees start from Trading fees only. The firm has operated since 2024.
RebelsFunding challenge fees start from $25. The firm has operated since 2022. They have funded over 30,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $3M+.
Klein Funding profit split: 40% → 70%. RebelsFunding profit split: 75% → 90%. RebelsFunding delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: Klein Funding pays On-demand; RebelsFunding pays On-demand (avg 12h). Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of Klein Funding:
Klein Funding is a London-based cryptocurrency prop firm founded in November 2024 by David Allard. It operates in the same Prague-adjacent EU-registered crypto prop firm category as HyroTrader and Mubite, but with one notable structural difference: rather than charging upfront challenge fees, Klein Funding’s costs come from Bybit exchange maker/taker fees (0.02% maker, 0.055% taker) accrued during trading. This makes it one of the few prop firms where the barrier to entry is behaviour, not capital.
The firm is still building its verified track record, but has accumulated a 4.9/5 customer rating across review platforms and offers one of the more flexible challenge structures in the crypto prop space — including a customisable drawdown system where traders set their own risk parameters.
Klein Funding is designed for cryptocurrency futures traders who want to choose their own risk profile rather than accept a fixed set of rules. The customisable drawdown model — where you set your maximum drawdown between 6% and 14%, with the profit target adjusting accordingly — suits traders who know their strategy’s risk parameters and want the rules to match them.
It is not suitable for forex, stocks, or indices traders, and traders who rely on automated systems, copy trading, or high-frequency strategies should note these are restricted. The firm is very young, which means the payout track record is still forming — experienced traders who prefer certainty may want to wait for more data.
Klein Funding offers four paths to funding:
Evaluation accounts range from $6,000 to $200,000. Challenge costs come from Bybit trading fees rather than upfront registration fees — check the Klein Funding website for the current fee structure as it may have been updated.
Klein Funding’s standout feature is its customisable risk system. You can set your maximum drawdown anywhere between 6% and 14%, and the profit target adjusts in proportion. Choosing a tighter drawdown (6%) means a lower profit target; choosing a looser drawdown (14%) means a higher target. Daily drawdown is always set at half your chosen maximum drawdown.
This is genuinely useful for systematic traders who know their strategy’s expected maximum drawdown and don’t want to be disqualified by an arbitrary rule that doesn’t match their approach.
The base 40% profit split on challenge accounts is below the industry standard of 70–80% seen at most competitors. Klein Funding’s model is structured differently to most — lower upfront costs but a lower initial split — so factor this into your overall return calculation before committing.
Klein Funding earns a 6.5 BestProp score. The customisable drawdown system is a genuinely innovative feature, the no-upfront-fee model lowers the barrier to entry, and the Instant Pro scaling path to $2M is ambitious. These are real positives.
The significant caution: Klein Funding launched in November 2024 and has no published track record of total payouts or funded trader numbers. The base 40% profit split on challenge accounts is the lowest we have reviewed. For traders who want to try the customisable drawdown model, starting with Instant Pro (70% split) rather than the evaluation path makes more financial sense until the firm establishes a longer track record.
Here is our full independent review of RebelsFunding:
RebelsFunding is a Bratislava-based prop firm founded in December 2022 by Marek Soska, a trader with 17 years of forex experience. The firm’s core philosophy is removing time pressure entirely — no phase deadlines on any program — and structuring the challenge system around trader development rather than a single pass/fail test. With five distinct programs (Copper through Diamond) and over 30,000 funded traders, RebelsFunding has carved out a clear niche for disciplined, patient traders who work best without the clock running.
The proprietary RF-Trader platform is built on TradingView charts connected directly to liquidity providers — a clean, familiar interface for traders used to TradingView without needing to switch to MT4/MT5.
RebelsFunding suits systematic manual traders who want to choose how many evaluation phases they take on in exchange for better fee refunds and lower profit targets per phase. Traders willing to go through four Copper phases at 5% each get a 200% fee refund at the end — a genuinely unusual upside. Those who prefer faster funding take Gold (1-phase, 10% target).
Important restriction: no automated trading — EAs, robots, and algorithmic systems are not permitted on any program. RebelsFunding is manual-only. Grid trading, martingale, and aggressive scalping are also banned. Traders who run automated strategies should look elsewhere.
RebelsFunding’s five-tier structure is one of the most distinct in the industry:
RF-Trader is RebelsFunding’s proprietary platform built on TradingView’s charting infrastructure with direct liquidity provider connections. It runs on web and desktop. MT4 and MT5 are not available.
Tradable assets: forex majors, crosses, and exotics; metals (gold, silver); indices; energies; stocks; crypto. Leverage varies significantly by asset class — up to 1:200 on major forex pairs (Copper/Bronze), dropping to 1:2.5 on stocks/crypto across all programs.
RebelsFunding earns a 7.4 BestProp score. The tiered program structure with up to 200% fee refunds is genuinely creative, the no-time-limit policy is a real differentiator for traders with longer time horizons, and the 12-hour average payout is competitive. The Diamond instant funding path scaling to $530,000 at Level 8 is one of the higher ceilings in the instant funding category.
The clear limitations: manual trading only (no EAs), $3M+ total paid is modest compared to larger competitors, and the 14-day wait for first withdrawal adds friction. For traders who work manually and value patience-friendly rules over speed, RebelsFunding is a genuinely strong option.
Overall, our independent scoring gives RebelsFunding the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If Klein Funding better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, RebelsFunding scores higher overall (8.5/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
Both firms have similar entry-level pricing. Compare the full fee schedule for your target account size.
RebelsFunding offers the higher profit split. Klein Funding: 40% → 70%. RebelsFunding: 75% → 90%.
EA policies: Klein Funding — check the review. RebelsFunding — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: Klein Funding — check the review. RebelsFunding — check the review.
Read the full Klein Funding review → · Read the full RebelsFunding review →
Based on our scoring methodology, RebelsFunding edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
Klein Funding offers 40% → 70% profit split, while RebelsFunding offers 75% → 90% profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Check our discount codes page for the latest verified promo codes for both firms.
Klein Funding processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while RebelsFunding takes approximately 14 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither Klein Funding nor RebelsFunding are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
