Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | For Traders | RebelsFunding |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 80% → 90% | 75% → 90% |
| First Payout | — | 14 |
| Payout Frequency | On-demand (48h guarantee) | On-demand (avg 12h) |
| Max Account Size | $100,000 | $320,000 |
Winner: For Traders
In this independent head-to-head comparison of For Traders vs RebelsFunding, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
For Traders: Our Challenge. Your Rules.
RebelsFunding: No Time Limits. Your Pace. Your Rules.
Based on our independent scoring methodology, For Traders scores 9.1/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: For Traders scores 9.1/10 vs RebelsFunding at 8.5/10.
Minimum Fee: For Traders starts from $50; RebelsFunding starts from $25. RebelsFunding is cheaper at entry level.
Profit Split: For Traders offers 80% → 90%; RebelsFunding offers 75% → 90%. For Traders has the higher split.
Platforms: For Traders supports TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5; RebelsFunding is on RF-Trader (TradingView-based).
Tradeable Markets: For Traders covers Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto, Futures; RebelsFunding offers Forex, Metals, Indices, Energies, Stocks, Crypto.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how For Traders and RebelsFunding compare on pricing.
For Traders challenge fees start from $50. The firm has operated since 2023. They have funded over 150,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $10M+.
RebelsFunding challenge fees start from $25. The firm has operated since 2022. They have funded over 30,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $3M+.
On entry-level pricing, RebelsFunding offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.
For Traders profit split: 80% → 90%. RebelsFunding profit split: 75% → 90%. For Traders delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: For Traders pays On-demand (48h guarantee); RebelsFunding pays On-demand (avg 12h). Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of For Traders:
For Traders launched in 2023 with a simple positioning statement: Our Challenge. Your Rules. The Prague and Dubai-based firm lets traders configure their challenge parameters — target, variant, and capital — before buying, rather than fitting their strategy to a fixed rulebook. With 150,000+ customers, $10M+ paid out, and a 48-hour payout guarantee (backed by a 100% profit split penalty if they miss it), For Traders has built a credible track record in a short time.
The firm covers forex, indices, metals, crypto, and futures — one of the broadest instrument sets in the funded trading space outside of FTMO — and supports TradeLocker, cTrader, and MT5 across web, mobile, and desktop.
For Traders suits multi-market traders who want to fund a forex, futures, or crypto account under a single brand. If you trade different asset classes with different strategies, For Traders lets you run separate programs per market rather than forcing everything into one account type.
The firm is also a strong fit for traders who prioritise payout reliability — the 48-hour guarantee with a financial penalty for delays is one of the few hard contractual commitments in the prop firm space.
For Traders offers five distinct funding programs:
Account sizes run from $5,000 up to $100,000 per market standard, with Premium Program access up to $300,000 for top-performing traders. Fees start at $50 for a $5,000 account, scaling to $399 for a $100,000 1-Step Forex account.
For Traders supports three platforms across all devices:
Tradable assets: 100+ forex pairs, 50+ crypto coins (24/7 including weekends), major indices (US30, NAS100, DAX40), gold, silver, oil, and futures contracts. MT4 is not supported.
For Traders’ payout infrastructure is one of its strongest selling points:
The card and crypto withdrawal options being free and instant are a genuine differentiator — most prop firms charge fees on all withdrawal methods.
For Traders earns an 8.2 BestProp score. The multi-market coverage, configurable challenge format, and 48-hour payout guarantee make it one of the more complete prop firm offerings launched in the last three years. The trailing drawdown on the 1-Step Forex program is more forgiving than static drawdown, which suits swing traders and position traders well.
The caution is the news trading restriction and the 40% margin rule — both require attention if you run macro-driven or high-leverage strategies. For traders who can work within those guardrails, For Traders delivers genuine value across forex, futures, and crypto from a single platform.
Here is our full independent review of RebelsFunding:
RebelsFunding is a Bratislava-based prop firm founded in December 2022 by Marek Soska, a trader with 17 years of forex experience. The firm’s core philosophy is removing time pressure entirely — no phase deadlines on any program — and structuring the challenge system around trader development rather than a single pass/fail test. With five distinct programs (Copper through Diamond) and over 30,000 funded traders, RebelsFunding has carved out a clear niche for disciplined, patient traders who work best without the clock running.
The proprietary RF-Trader platform is built on TradingView charts connected directly to liquidity providers — a clean, familiar interface for traders used to TradingView without needing to switch to MT4/MT5.
RebelsFunding suits systematic manual traders who want to choose how many evaluation phases they take on in exchange for better fee refunds and lower profit targets per phase. Traders willing to go through four Copper phases at 5% each get a 200% fee refund at the end — a genuinely unusual upside. Those who prefer faster funding take Gold (1-phase, 10% target).
Important restriction: no automated trading — EAs, robots, and algorithmic systems are not permitted on any program. RebelsFunding is manual-only. Grid trading, martingale, and aggressive scalping are also banned. Traders who run automated strategies should look elsewhere.
RebelsFunding’s five-tier structure is one of the most distinct in the industry:
RF-Trader is RebelsFunding’s proprietary platform built on TradingView’s charting infrastructure with direct liquidity provider connections. It runs on web and desktop. MT4 and MT5 are not available.
Tradable assets: forex majors, crosses, and exotics; metals (gold, silver); indices; energies; stocks; crypto. Leverage varies significantly by asset class — up to 1:200 on major forex pairs (Copper/Bronze), dropping to 1:2.5 on stocks/crypto across all programs.
RebelsFunding earns a 7.4 BestProp score. The tiered program structure with up to 200% fee refunds is genuinely creative, the no-time-limit policy is a real differentiator for traders with longer time horizons, and the 12-hour average payout is competitive. The Diamond instant funding path scaling to $530,000 at Level 8 is one of the higher ceilings in the instant funding category.
The clear limitations: manual trading only (no EAs), $3M+ total paid is modest compared to larger competitors, and the 14-day wait for first withdrawal adds friction. For traders who work manually and value patience-friendly rules over speed, RebelsFunding is a genuinely strong option.
Overall, our independent scoring gives For Traders the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If RebelsFunding better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, For Traders scores higher overall (9.1/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
RebelsFunding offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.
For Traders offers the higher profit split. For Traders: 80% → 90%. RebelsFunding: 75% → 90%.
EA policies: For Traders — check the review. RebelsFunding — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: For Traders — check the review. RebelsFunding — check the review.
Read the full For Traders review → · Read the full RebelsFunding review →
Based on our scoring methodology, For Traders edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
For Traders offers 80% → 90% profit split, while RebelsFunding offers 75% → 90% profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Yes! For Traders has code BESTPROP10. Use these at checkout to save on your challenge fee.
For Traders processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while RebelsFunding takes approximately 14 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither For Traders nor RebelsFunding are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
