Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | For Traders | Forexive |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 80% → 90% | 80% (up to 95%) |
| First Payout | — | 14 |
| Payout Frequency | On-demand (48h guarantee) | Bi-weekly |
| Max Account Size | $100,000 | $200,000 |
In this independent head-to-head comparison of For Traders vs Forexive, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
For Traders: Our Challenge. Your Rules.
Forexive: Est. Sep 2024, UK. Up to 95% Split. 2-Step 12% Max DD. EAs & Copy Trading OK.
Based on our independent scoring methodology, For Traders scores 9.1/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: For Traders scores 9.1/10 vs Forexive at 7.4/10.
Minimum Fee: For Traders starts from $50; Forexive starts from $49. Forexive is cheaper at entry level.
Profit Split: For Traders offers 80% → 90%; Forexive offers 80% (up to 95%). Forexive has the higher split.
Platforms: For Traders supports TradeLocker, cTrader, MT5; Forexive is on MT4, MT5.
Tradeable Markets: For Traders covers Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto, Futures; Forexive offers Forex only.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how For Traders and Forexive compare on pricing.
For Traders challenge fees start from $50. The firm has operated since 2023. They have funded over 150,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $10M+.
Forexive challenge fees start from $49. The firm has operated since 2024.
On entry-level pricing, Forexive offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.
For Traders profit split: 80% → 90%. Forexive profit split: 80% (up to 95%). Forexive delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: For Traders pays On-demand (48h guarantee); Forexive pays Bi-weekly. Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of For Traders:
For Traders launched in 2023 with a simple positioning statement: Our Challenge. Your Rules. The Prague and Dubai-based firm lets traders configure their challenge parameters — target, variant, and capital — before buying, rather than fitting their strategy to a fixed rulebook. With 150,000+ customers, $10M+ paid out, and a 48-hour payout guarantee (backed by a 100% profit split penalty if they miss it), For Traders has built a credible track record in a short time.
The firm covers forex, indices, metals, crypto, and futures — one of the broadest instrument sets in the funded trading space outside of FTMO — and supports TradeLocker, cTrader, and MT5 across web, mobile, and desktop.
For Traders suits multi-market traders who want to fund a forex, futures, or crypto account under a single brand. If you trade different asset classes with different strategies, For Traders lets you run separate programs per market rather than forcing everything into one account type.
The firm is also a strong fit for traders who prioritise payout reliability — the 48-hour guarantee with a financial penalty for delays is one of the few hard contractual commitments in the prop firm space.
For Traders offers five distinct funding programs:
Account sizes run from $5,000 up to $100,000 per market standard, with Premium Program access up to $300,000 for top-performing traders. Fees start at $50 for a $5,000 account, scaling to $399 for a $100,000 1-Step Forex account.
For Traders supports three platforms across all devices:
Tradable assets: 100+ forex pairs, 50+ crypto coins (24/7 including weekends), major indices (US30, NAS100, DAX40), gold, silver, oil, and futures contracts. MT4 is not supported.
For Traders’ payout infrastructure is one of its strongest selling points:
The card and crypto withdrawal options being free and instant are a genuine differentiator — most prop firms charge fees on all withdrawal methods.
For Traders earns an 8.2 BestProp score. The multi-market coverage, configurable challenge format, and 48-hour payout guarantee make it one of the more complete prop firm offerings launched in the last three years. The trailing drawdown on the 1-Step Forex program is more forgiving than static drawdown, which suits swing traders and position traders well.
The caution is the news trading restriction and the 40% margin rule — both require attention if you run macro-driven or high-leverage strategies. For traders who can work within those guardrails, For Traders delivers genuine value across forex, futures, and crypto from a single platform.
Here is our full independent review of Forexive:
Forexive Ltd (Company No. 15746920) was founded on 30 September 2024 and is registered in the United Kingdom, led by CEO Hooman Abbasi. The firm operates from Czech Republic and is active in 180+ countries with a team of 100+. Forexive offers two evaluation tracks (1-Step and 2-Step) with a top split reaching 95% and a maximum initial account of $250,000, scaling to $2,000,000. All accounts run on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Instruments are currently limited to Forex only.
As a September 2024 launch, Forexive has a very limited public operating history. TheTrustedProp’s verification score of 60/100 (Average) reflects this early-stage status. The firm offers swap-free accounts, copy trading, and EA support as standard, with a commission of $3 per round lot.
1-Step Challenge ($65-$1,099 for $5K-$200K): Single phase, 10% profit target. Daily loss: 3% (equity-based static). Max drawdown: 6% (equity-based static). Leverage: 1:50 standard, 1:30 swing. Minimum 3 profitable trading days. Profit split: 80-95%. Unlimited time. No consistency rule published. Best for traders who prefer a single-phase evaluation with moderate drawdown parameters.
2-Step Challenge ($49-$999 for $5K-$200K): Phase 1: 10% target. Phase 2: 5% target. Daily loss: 5% (equity-based static). Max drawdown: 12% (equity-based static — one of the widest buffers in the 2-Step category). Leverage: 1:100 standard, 1:30 swing. Minimum 3 profitable trading days. Profit split: 80-95%. Unlimited time. The 12% max drawdown gives traders significant room to manage normal drawdown cycles across both evaluation phases.
Platforms: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Instruments: Forex only. Spreads from 0.0 pips. Match Trader and cTrader are listed as coming soon — the platform roadmap suggests expansion is planned but not yet available. Leverage up to 1:100 (2-Step) and 1:50 (1-Step).
Forexive earns a 6.0 BestProp score. The 2-Step 12% maximum drawdown is genuinely competitive — matching FundsCap’s industry-leading buffer at comparable fees. The 95% maximum profit split is among the highest published by any prop firm. EAs, copy trading, and swap-free accounts are all standard. Multiple crypto and bank payout methods add withdrawal flexibility.
The primary concerns: Forexive launched in September 2024 and has less than a year of operation at publication. TheTrustedProp’s 60/100 verification score is average and reflects the limited track record. Instruments are restricted to Forex only — no metals, indices, or crypto — which eliminates the firm for multi-asset traders. The $3/lot commission adds ongoing cost for active traders. Platforms beyond MT4/MT5 are still listed as coming soon. The customer rating of 4.1/5 is modest compared to established competitors. The combination of very young age, Forex-only instruments, and average trust score makes Forexive a monitored watch rather than a confident first-choice recommendation at this stage.
Overall, our independent scoring gives For Traders the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If Forexive better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, For Traders scores higher overall (9.1/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
Forexive offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.
Forexive offers the higher profit split. For Traders: 80% → 90%. Forexive: 80% (up to 95%).
EA policies: For Traders — check the review. Forexive — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: For Traders — check the review. Forexive — check the review.
Read the full For Traders review → · Read the full Forexive review →
Based on our scoring methodology, For Traders edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
For Traders offers 80% → 90% profit split, while Forexive offers 80% (up to 95%) profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Yes! For Traders: 15% off — code BESTPROP10. See the offer button above for full terms.
For Traders processes first payouts in a variable timeframe, while Forexive takes approximately 14 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither For Traders nor Forexive are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
