Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | FunderPro | Forexive |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 80% (up to 90%) | 80% (up to 95%) |
| First Payout | 1 | 14 |
| Payout Frequency | Daily, Weekly, or Bi-weekly | Bi-weekly |
| Max Account Size | $200,000 | $200,000 |
In this independent head-to-head comparison of FunderPro vs Forexive, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
FunderPro: Malta, Est. 2023. $21M+ Paid Out. 158 Instruments. Daily Payouts.
Forexive: Est. Sep 2024, UK. Up to 95% Split. 2-Step 12% Max DD. EAs & Copy Trading OK.
Based on our independent scoring methodology, FunderPro scores 8.3/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: FunderPro scores 8.3/10 vs Forexive at 7.4/10.
Minimum Fee: FunderPro starts from $79; Forexive starts from $49. Forexive is cheaper at entry level.
Profit Split: FunderPro offers 80% (up to 90%); Forexive offers 80% (up to 95%). Forexive has the higher split.
Platforms: FunderPro supports TradeLocker, cTrader; Forexive is on MT4, MT5.
Tradeable Markets: FunderPro covers Forex, Indices, Crypto, Stocks, Metals, Energies (158 assets); Forexive offers Forex only.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how FunderPro and Forexive compare on pricing.
FunderPro challenge fees start from $79. The firm has operated since 2023. Total payouts to date: $21,000,000+.
Forexive challenge fees start from $49. The firm has operated since 2024.
On entry-level pricing, Forexive offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.
FunderPro profit split: 80% (up to 90%). Forexive profit split: 80% (up to 95%). Forexive delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: FunderPro pays Daily, Weekly, or Bi-weekly; Forexive pays Bi-weekly. Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of FunderPro:
FunderPro was founded in May 2023 by CEO Gary Mullen and is registered in Malta. The firm offers three distinct challenge structures across account sizes from $5,000 to $200,000, with a maximum single allocation of $200,000. Over $21,000,000 has been paid out to traders. Trustpilot score stands at 4.0/5 from 754 reviews. All accounts operate on TradeLocker or cTrader with access to 158 instruments across Forex, Indices, Crypto, Stocks, Metals, and Energies.
All FunderPro drawdown limits are static and balance-based — calculated at 5:00 p.m. EST (start of each trading day). There is no trailing drawdown on any program. Payouts are processed within one working day of approval, available daily, weekly, or bi-weekly.
A single-phase evaluation with a 14% profit target — among the higher single-phase targets in the industry. Daily loss limit: 4%. Max overall drawdown: 7% static. Leverage up to 1:50. News trading is not permitted on this track. 80% profit split on funded accounts. Fees: $5K/$79, $10K/$139, $25K/$249, $50K/$349, $100K/$549, $150K/$819, $200K/$1,099.
Two-phase evaluation with 10% (Phase 1) and 5% (Phase 2) profit targets. Daily loss: 5%. Max drawdown: 10% static. Leverage up to 1:100. Minimum 4 trading days. News trading is not permitted. No consistency rule. 80% split on funded accounts. Same fees as One Phase at each account size.
Single-phase evaluation with 10% target. Daily loss: 5%. Max drawdown: 10% static. Leverage restricted to 1:30 (suitable for commodity/index swing trades). News trading is permitted — the only FunderPro program where it is allowed. 80% split. Fees carry a small premium: $5K/$89, $10K/$149, $25K/$269, $50K/$379, $100K/$599, $150K/$899, $200K/$1,199.
A skip-evaluation funded path starting from $79 for accounts up to $100,000. Full terms are available on the FunderPro website. Verify current pricing and rules before purchase as this is a separate product with distinct parameters.
Platforms: TradeLocker, cTrader. Instruments: 158 assets including major, minor, and exotic Forex pairs, global indices, cryptocurrencies, equities, metals, and energy products. One of the widest instrument selections among Malta-registered prop firms.
FunderPro earns a 7.2 BestProp score. Founded in 2023, the firm has paid out $21M+ and holds a 4.0/5 Trustpilot from 754 reviews — a reasonable track record for a two-year-old operation. Three distinct programs (One Phase, Regular 2-Phase, Swing) cover different trading styles. The 158-instrument count is genuinely broad, and the daily/weekly/bi-weekly payout flexibility adds convenience. EAs are permitted and same-day payout processing is fast by industry standards.
Key watch points: news trading is prohibited on Classic and One Phase — only the Swing program permits it. The One Phase 14% target with a 7% max drawdown is a tight risk-reward ratio for evaluation. Payout methods are limited to Riseworks and USDC crypto, which may not suit all traders. Verify whether ongoing post-activation fees apply to your chosen program. Overall a solid mid-tier option, particularly for EA traders and swing traders on the Swing program.
Here is our full independent review of Forexive:
Forexive Ltd (Company No. 15746920) was founded on 30 September 2024 and is registered in the United Kingdom, led by CEO Hooman Abbasi. The firm operates from Czech Republic and is active in 180+ countries with a team of 100+. Forexive offers two evaluation tracks (1-Step and 2-Step) with a top split reaching 95% and a maximum initial account of $250,000, scaling to $2,000,000. All accounts run on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Instruments are currently limited to Forex only.
As a September 2024 launch, Forexive has a very limited public operating history. TheTrustedProp’s verification score of 60/100 (Average) reflects this early-stage status. The firm offers swap-free accounts, copy trading, and EA support as standard, with a commission of $3 per round lot.
1-Step Challenge ($65-$1,099 for $5K-$200K): Single phase, 10% profit target. Daily loss: 3% (equity-based static). Max drawdown: 6% (equity-based static). Leverage: 1:50 standard, 1:30 swing. Minimum 3 profitable trading days. Profit split: 80-95%. Unlimited time. No consistency rule published. Best for traders who prefer a single-phase evaluation with moderate drawdown parameters.
2-Step Challenge ($49-$999 for $5K-$200K): Phase 1: 10% target. Phase 2: 5% target. Daily loss: 5% (equity-based static). Max drawdown: 12% (equity-based static — one of the widest buffers in the 2-Step category). Leverage: 1:100 standard, 1:30 swing. Minimum 3 profitable trading days. Profit split: 80-95%. Unlimited time. The 12% max drawdown gives traders significant room to manage normal drawdown cycles across both evaluation phases.
Platforms: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Instruments: Forex only. Spreads from 0.0 pips. Match Trader and cTrader are listed as coming soon — the platform roadmap suggests expansion is planned but not yet available. Leverage up to 1:100 (2-Step) and 1:50 (1-Step).
Forexive earns a 6.0 BestProp score. The 2-Step 12% maximum drawdown is genuinely competitive — matching FundsCap’s industry-leading buffer at comparable fees. The 95% maximum profit split is among the highest published by any prop firm. EAs, copy trading, and swap-free accounts are all standard. Multiple crypto and bank payout methods add withdrawal flexibility.
The primary concerns: Forexive launched in September 2024 and has less than a year of operation at publication. TheTrustedProp’s 60/100 verification score is average and reflects the limited track record. Instruments are restricted to Forex only — no metals, indices, or crypto — which eliminates the firm for multi-asset traders. The $3/lot commission adds ongoing cost for active traders. Platforms beyond MT4/MT5 are still listed as coming soon. The customer rating of 4.1/5 is modest compared to established competitors. The combination of very young age, Forex-only instruments, and average trust score makes Forexive a monitored watch rather than a confident first-choice recommendation at this stage.
Overall, our independent scoring gives FunderPro the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If Forexive better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, FunderPro scores higher overall (8.3/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
Forexive offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.
Forexive offers the higher profit split. FunderPro: 80% (up to 90%). Forexive: 80% (up to 95%).
EA policies: FunderPro — check the review. Forexive — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: FunderPro — check the review. Forexive — check the review.
Read the full FunderPro review → · Read the full Forexive review →
Based on our scoring methodology, FunderPro edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
FunderPro offers 80% (up to 90%) profit split, while Forexive offers 80% (up to 95%) profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.
FunderPro processes first payouts in 1 day(s), while Forexive takes approximately 14 day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither FunderPro nor Forexive are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
