Our editorial team compared every key metric — fees, rules, profit split, payouts — so you can pick the right firm.
| Feature | Blueberry Funded | iFunds |
|---|---|---|
| Payout | ||
| Profit Split | 80% → 90% | 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen) |
| First Payout | 14 | On demand |
| Payout Frequency | Bi-weekly (7-day and on-demand available) | On demand |
| Max Account Size | $200,000 | $500,000 |
Winner: Blueberry Funded
In this independent head-to-head comparison of Blueberry Funded vs iFunds, we break down challenge rules, pricing, profit splits, and payout conditions to help you decide which prop firm is the better fit for your trading style.
Blueberry Funded: Broker-Backed Prop Trading. ASIC-Regulated Foundation.
iFunds: No Evaluation. Choose Your Own Max DD. 50-80% Split. 24h Payout Guarantee.
Based on our independent scoring methodology, Blueberry Funded scores 8.6/10 overall — but the best choice depends on your specific needs. Read the full comparison below.
BestProp Score: Blueberry Funded scores 8.6/10 vs iFunds at 7.8/10.
Minimum Fee: Blueberry Funded starts from $145; iFunds starts from $250. Blueberry Funded is cheaper at entry level.
Profit Split: Blueberry Funded offers 80% → 90%; iFunds offers 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen). Blueberry Funded has the higher split.
Platforms: Blueberry Funded supports MT4, MT5, DXtrade, TradeLocker; iFunds is on MT4, MT5.
Tradeable Markets: Blueberry Funded covers Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto; iFunds offers Forex, Metals, Energies, Crypto, Stocks.
Challenge fees are typically the biggest factor when choosing a prop firm. Here is how Blueberry Funded and iFunds compare on pricing.
Blueberry Funded challenge fees start from $145. The firm has operated since 2024. They have funded over 15,000+ traders. Total payouts to date: $8M+.
iFunds challenge fees start from $250. The firm has operated since 2024.
On entry-level pricing, Blueberry Funded offers a lower starting fee — an important factor if you are testing with a smaller account first.
Blueberry Funded profit split: 80% → 90%. iFunds profit split: 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen). Blueberry Funded delivers the higher cut to traders.
Payout frequency: Blueberry Funded pays Bi-weekly (7-day and on-demand available); iFunds pays On demand. Faster payouts are better for cash flow management.
Here is our full independent review of Blueberry Funded:
Blueberry Funded launched in August 2024 as the prop trading arm of Blueberry Markets — an ASIC-regulated forex broker with an established reputation in the retail trading space. This broker-backed structure is the firm’s defining credential: unlike standalone prop firms, Blueberry Funded operates from a foundation of regulatory oversight and institutional-grade infrastructure that most prop firm startups cannot match.
With 15,000+ active traders and $8M+ in payouts at under a year old, the growth trajectory is strong. The five-program structure — from beginner instant accounts to a Prime 2-Step challenge — gives traders more entry options than most competitors.
Blueberry Funded suits forex and multi-asset traders who value the credibility of a broker-backed firm over lower fees or faster payouts. The ASIC-regulated parent company brings compliance standards and infrastructure that independent prop firms typically lack — a meaningful differentiator for traders who have concerns about firm legitimacy.
The firm also stands out for permitting martingale and grid trading strategies — approaches banned at most prop firms. If your strategy relies on these methods, Blueberry Funded is one of very few funded trading programs that will accept your application.
Blueberry Funded offers five paths to funding:
Account sizes from $1,250 to $200,000 across all programs. No time limits on any challenge phase.
Blueberry Funded supports four platforms: MT4, MT5, DXtrade, and TradeLocker — one of the broader platform selections available, catering to both legacy MetaTrader users and traders on newer platforms. Instruments cover forex pairs, metals, indices, commodities, and crypto.
Blueberry Funded earns a 7.6 BestProp score. The ASIC-regulated broker backing is the headline feature — it provides structural credibility that independent prop firms cannot replicate, and for traders who prioritise legitimacy above all else, that matters. The martingale and grid permission is also genuinely rare and valuable for traders who use those approaches.
The trade-offs are a 4.1/5 Trustpilot rating (below the industry leaders), a 14-day default payout cycle, and relatively low crypto leverage (1:2). Founded in August 2024, the track record is still building. As the firm matures under its regulated parent, these scores should improve — Blueberry Funded is one to watch as much as one to join now.
Here is our full independent review of iFunds:
iFunds is operated by iFunds Ltd (Saint Lucia, Registration No. 2024-00154) and Synerjic Ltd (Cyprus, Registration No. 474148), led by CEO Layth Sanjaq. The firm offers a purely instant-funded model — there is no evaluation phase. Traders receive capital immediately and configure their own risk parameters at purchase. iFunds holds a 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating with 93% five-star reviews. Maximum account size is $500,000. Payouts are processed within 24 hours, with a 10% bonus (up to $1,000) if the 24-hour window is missed.
The defining feature of iFunds is its customizable risk-reward model: traders select their maximum drawdown threshold at account purchase (between 6% and 10% of initial balance). A lower chosen drawdown ceiling yields a higher profit split; a higher drawdown tolerance yields a lower split. This places risk management directly in the trader’s hands from day one.
No evaluation. No profit target to begin trading. Traders select a max drawdown level — the lower the max DD they accept, the higher their profit share. The exact split-to-DD mapping is:
There is no daily loss limit on any iFunds account — only the chosen maximum drawdown applies. This gives traders full intraday flexibility; only the total equity drop from the starting balance is monitored.
Note: fees represent a meaningful percentage of account size on smaller accounts ($250 for $2,500 = 10%). This is consistent with instant-funded models where no evaluation filters risk, and reflects the immediacy of funded access. Fees are described as a participation fee — refund terms are governed by iFunds’ separate Refund Policy.
Platforms: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5. Instruments: Stocks, currencies, metals, energies, cryptocurrencies. Leverage: up to 1:100 (dynamic, based on risk level). All instruments accessible on both platforms with the same account.
iFunds earns a 6.5 BestProp score. The customizable risk-reward model is genuinely innovative — letting traders choose their own drawdown tolerance and receive a commensurate profit share puts risk management in the right hands. 4.7/5 Trustpilot with 93% five-star reviews is excellent for a 2024-registered firm. No daily loss limit provides real intraday freedom. EAs, news trading, trade copiers, and multi-IP are all permitted with minimal restrictions. On-demand payouts with a 24-hour guarantee and bonus incentive are strong operational commitments.
The main caution is the fee-to-account-size ratio on small accounts: $250 for a $2,500 funded account is a 10% upfront cost, and the base profit split at the highest drawdown tolerance is only 50%. Traders who want immediate funding of small accounts should run the numbers carefully — at 50% split and $250 fee, the break-even is $500 in gross profit (1 * fee * 2), meaning the account must gain 20% before the trader recups the fee net of split. iFunds works best for confident, disciplined traders who can accept tight drawdown limits in exchange for a higher profit share, or those with access to automated strategies that benefit from no daily DD restriction. The 2024 registration means the track record, while so far positive, is less than two years old.
Overall, our independent scoring gives Blueberry Funded the edge in this 2026 comparison. However, both firms have their merits. If iFunds better matches your specific trading style, instruments, or preferred platform, it may still be the right choice for you.
Use our comparison table above and review the challenge fees at both firms before making your final decision. Both offer risk-free evaluation programs — the challenge fee is the only money at risk.
Based on our independent scoring, Blueberry Funded scores higher overall (8.6/10). The best choice depends on your trading style, preferred instruments, and account size.
Blueberry Funded offers a lower entry-level challenge fee. However, always compare the full account sizes you plan to trade before deciding purely on price.
Blueberry Funded offers the higher profit split. Blueberry Funded: 80% → 90%. iFunds: 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen).
EA policies: Blueberry Funded — check the review. iFunds — check the review. Always verify the latest policy directly with the firm.
News trading: Blueberry Funded — check the review. iFunds — check the review.
Read the full Blueberry Funded review → · Read the full iFunds review →
Based on our scoring methodology, Blueberry Funded edges ahead in this comparison. However, the best choice depends on your trading style, preferred platform and account size. Read the full breakdown above for a detailed verdict.
Blueberry Funded offers 80% → 90% profit split, while iFunds offers 50-80% (inversely linked to max DD chosen) profit split. Check each firm's current terms as these can change.
Check our offers page for the latest verified deals on both firms.
Blueberry Funded processes first payouts in 14 day(s), while iFunds takes approximately On demand day(s). Always verify current payout timelines on the firm's website.
Neither Blueberry Funded nor iFunds are regulated in the traditional financial sense — prop firms operate as private companies providing traders access to simulated or real capital. Always read the terms and conditions carefully before participating in any prop challenge.
